| dc.contributor.author | Desker, Barry. |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2008-11-13T02:54:37Z |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2009-07-29T06:26:45Z |
| dc.date.available | 2008-11-13T02:54:37Z |
| dc.date.available | 2009-07-29T06:26:45Z |
| dc.date.copyright | 2006 |
| dc.date.issued | 2008-11-13T02:54:37Z |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10220/4163 |
| dc.format.extent | 3 p. |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | RSIS Commentaries ; 65/06 |
| dc.rights | Nanyang Technological University |
| dc.title | Is the ARF obsolete? : three moves to avoid irrelevance. |
| dc.type | Commentary |
| dc.contributor.school | S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies |
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSIS-COMMENT_316.pdf | 35.83Kb |
View/ |
| All Items | Views |
| Is the ARF obsolete? : three moves to avoid irrelevance. | 109 |
| All Bitstreams | Views |
| RSIS-COMMENT_316.pdf | 43 |
| Country Code | Views |
| United States of America | 16 |
| China | 11 |
| Czech Republic | 2 |
| United Kingdom | 2 |
| Russian Federation | 2 |
| city | Views |
| Mountain View | 13 |
| Beijing | 2 |
| Prague | 2 |
| Singapore | 2 |
| Southampton | 2 |