mirage

Relevancy rankings : pay for performance search engines in the hot seat

DSpace/Manakin Repository

 

Search DR-NTU


Advanced Search Subject Search

Browse

My Account

Relevancy rankings : pay for performance search engines in the hot seat

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Goh, Dion Hoe-Lian
dc.contributor.author Ang, Rebecca P.
dc.date.accessioned 2009-12-30T01:05:58Z
dc.date.available 2009-12-30T01:05:58Z
dc.date.copyright 2003
dc.date.issued 2009-12-30T01:05:58Z
dc.identifier.citation Goh, D. H. L., & Ang, R. P. H. (2003). Relevancy rankings: Pay for performance search engines in the hot seat. Online Information Review, 27(2), 87-93.
dc.identifier.issn 1468-4527
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10220/6171
dc.description.abstract Pay for performance (PFP) search engines provide search services for documents on the Web but unlike “traditional” search engines, they rank documents not on content characteristics but according to the amount of money the owner of a Web site is willing to pay if a user visits the Web site through the search results pages. A study was conducted to compare the retrieval effectiveness of Overture (a PFP search engine) and Google (a traditional search engine) using a test suite of general knowledge questions. Forty-five queries based on a popular game show “Who Wants to be a Millionaire” were submitted to each of these search engines and the first 10 documents returned were analyzed using different relevancy criteria. Results indicated that Google outperformed Overture in terms of precision and number of queries that could be answered. Implications for this study are also discussed.
dc.format.extent 18 p.
dc.language.iso en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Online information review
dc.subject DRNTU::Engineering::Computer science and engineering::Computer systems organization::Computer-communication networks
dc.title Relevancy rankings : pay for performance search engines in the hot seat
dc.type Journal Article
dc.contributor.school Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14684520310471699
dc.description.version Published version

Files in this item

Files Size Format View Description
2003-pfp-searchengines-oir.pdf 189.4Kb PDF View/Open Main article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics

Total views

All Items Views
Relevancy rankings : pay for performance search engines in the hot seat 671

Total downloads

All Bitstreams Views
2003-pfp-searchengines-oir.pdf 264

Top country downloads

Country Code Views
United States of America 97
Singapore 72
China 21
Russian Federation 8
Austria 5

Top city downloads

city Views
Singapore 72
Mountain View 49
Redmond 10
Beijing 5
Ann Arbor 4

Downloads / month

  2014-10 2014-11 2014-12 total
2003-pfp-searchengines-oir.pdf 0 0 3 3