| dc.contributor.author |
Richard A. Bitzinger. |
| dc.date.accessioned |
2011-01-13T08:40:50Z |
| dc.date.available |
2011-01-13T08:40:50Z |
| dc.date.copyright |
2010 |
| dc.date.issued |
2011-01-13T08:40:50Z |
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/6568 |
| dc.description.abstract |
The Department of Defence’s long-awaited Quadrennial Defence Review offers little new when it comes to discussing the future direction of the US military. More notably, it hardly mentions the
“transformation” of the US military, or the likely future challenges of a Chinese “peer competitor”. |
| dc.format.extent |
3 p. |
| dc.language.iso |
en |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries |
RSIS Commentaries ; 018/10 |
| dc.subject |
DRNTU::Social sciences::Military and naval science::Strategy. |
| dc.title |
The dog that didn’t bark? The 2010 Quadrennial Defence Review. |
| dc.type |
Commentary |
| dc.contributor.school |
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies |
