dc.contributor.authorHwang, Heungsun
dc.contributor.authorMalhotra, Naresh K.
dc.contributor.authorKim, Youngchan
dc.contributor.authorTomiuk, Marc A.
dc.contributor.authorHong, Sungjin
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-03T03:16:10Z
dc.date.available2013-10-03T03:16:10Z
dc.date.copyright2010en_US
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationHwang, H., Malhotra, N. K., Kim, Y., Tomiuk, M. A., & Hong, S. (2010). A comparative study on parameter recovery of three approaches to structural equation modeling. Journal of marketing research, 47(4), 699-712.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-2437en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10220/16229
dc.description.abstractTraditionally, two approaches have been employed for structural equation modeling: covariance structure analysis and partial least squares. A third alternative, generalized structured component analysis, was introduced recently in the psychometric literature. The authors conduct a simulation study to evaluate the relative performance of these three approaches in terms of parameter recovery under different experimental conditions of sample size, data distribution, and model specification. In this study, model specification is the only meaningful condition in differentiating the performance of the three approaches in parameter recovery. Specifically, when the model is correctly specified, covariance structure analysis tends to recover parameters better than the other two approaches. Conversely, when the model is misspecified, generalized structured component analysis tends to recover parameters better. Finally, partial least squares exhibits inferior performance in parameter recovery compared with the other approaches. In particular, this tendency is salient when the model involves cross-loadings. Thus, generalized structured component analysis may be a good alternative to partial least squares for structural equation modeling and is recommended over covariance structure analysis unless correct model specification is ensured.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of marketing researchen_US
dc.rights© 2010 American Marketing Association. This paper was published in Journal of Marketing Research and is made available as an electronic reprint (preprint) with permission of American Marketing Association. The paper can be found at the following official DOI: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.4.699].  One print or electronic copy may be made for personal use only. Systematic or multiple reproduction, distribution to multiple locations via electronic or other means, duplication of any material in this paper for a fee or for commercial purposes, or modification of the content of the paper is prohibited and is subject to penalties under law.en_US
dc.subjectDRNTU::Business
dc.titleA comparative study on parameter recovery of three approaches to structural equation modelingen_US
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.contributor.schoolCollege of Business (Nanyang Business School)en_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.4.699
dc.description.versionPublished versionen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record