Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||The domain of the replicators : selection, neutrality, and cultural evolution||Authors:||Lansing, J. Stephen.
Cox, Murray P.
|Keywords:||DRNTU::Social sciences::Sociology::Anthropology||Issue Date:||2011||Source:||Lansing, J. S., & Cox, M. P. (2011). The Domain of the Replicators. Current Anthropology, 52(1), 105-125.||Series/Report no.:||Current anthropology||Abstract:||Do cultural phenomena undergo evolutionary change, in a Darwinian sense? If so, is evolutionary game theory (EGT) the best way to study them? Opinion on these questions is sharply divided. Proponents of EGT argue that it offers a unified theoretical framework for the social sciences, while critics even deny that Darwinian models are appropriately applied to culture. To evaluate these claims, we examine three facets of cultural evolution: (i) cultural traits that evolve by Darwinian selection, (ii) cultural traits that affect biological fitness, and (iii) coevolution of culture and biology, where selection in one affects evolutionary outcomes in the other. For each of these cases, the relevance of EGT depends on whether its assumptions are met. Those assumptions are quite restrictive: selection is constant, time horizons are deep, the external environment is not part of the game, and neutral processes such as drift are irrelevant. If these conditions are not met, other evolutionary models such as neutrality, coalescence theory, or niche construction may prove more appropriate. We conclude that Darwinian processes can occur in all three types of cultural or biological change. However, exclusive reliance on EGT can obscure the respective roles of selective and neutral processes.||URI:||https://hdl.handle.net/10356/100255
|DOI:||http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/657643||Rights:||© 2011 by The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. This paper was published in Current Anthropology and is made available as an electronic reprint (preprint) with permission of by The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. The paper can be found at the following official DOI: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/657643]. One print or electronic copy may be made for personal use only. Systematic or multiple reproduction, distribution to multiple locations via electronic or other means, duplication of any material in this paper for a fee or for commercial purposes, or modification of the content of the paper is prohibited and is subject to penalties under law.||Fulltext Permission:||open||Fulltext Availability:||With Fulltext|
|Appears in Collections:||HSS Journal Articles|
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.