Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||The inference-boundary model reinterpreting theme and rheme||Authors:||Leong, Ping Alvin||Keywords:||DRNTU::Social sciences::Psychology||Issue Date:||2000||Source:||Leong, P. A. (2000). The inference-boundary model reinterpreting theme and rheme. Language sciences, 22(1), 1-26.||Series/Report no.:||Language sciences||Abstract:||The Hallidayan notions of theme and rheme pose an interesting challenge to linguists in their attempts to pin them down more specifically. This paper argues that since the thematic structure of the clause organises it as a message, a useful starting point in theme–rheme research is an understanding of how clausal messages are typically processed by language users. A cognitive psychological model is constructed in this paper. It views theme as an element that generates a boundary of acceptability within which it is permissible for the rheme to occur. Underlying the thematic structure of the clause is a principle dictating that the theme must be acceptably developed by the rheme. This principle forms the basis of a test to identify and delimit the thematic head.||URI:||https://hdl.handle.net/10356/100660
|ISSN:||0388-0001||DOI:||http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(99)00003-0||Rights:||© 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Language Sciences, Elsevier Science Ltd. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(99)00003-0].||Fulltext Permission:||open||Fulltext Availability:||With Fulltext|
|Appears in Collections:||HSS Journal Articles|
Files in This Item:
|The inference-boundary model Reinterpreting theme and rheme.pdf||290.78 kB||Adobe PDF|
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.