Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Should we retire the catalog?||Authors:||Cmor, Dianne
|Keywords:||DRNTU::Library and information science::Libraries::Information retrieval and analysis||Issue Date:||2014||Source:||Cmor, D. & Litwan, R. (2014). Should we retire the catalog? Reference & user services quarterly, 53(3), 213-216.||Series/Report no.:||Reference & user services quarterly||Abstract:||As more libraries adopt web-scale discovery services, many now find themselves offering two options for searching their holdings: the new discovery tool and the traditional OPAC. Are both necessary? Or does a discovery system by itself provide an adequate search environment, making the catalog superfluous? In this installment of “Taking Issues,” Dianne Cmor argues that investing in two search tools is an unwise use of limited resources. Rory Litwin counters that the direct control traditional OPACs offer is a necessity for librarians and other advanced researchers.||URI:||https://hdl.handle.net/10356/102293
|ISSN:||1094-9054||DOI:||10.5860/rusq.53n3.213||Rights:||© 2014 American Library Association. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Reference & User Services Quarterly, American Library Association. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [http://rusa.metapress.com/content/x6408g8288175650].||Fulltext Permission:||open||Fulltext Availability:||With Fulltext|
|Appears in Collections:||LIB Journal Articles|
Files in This Item:
|RUSQ Taking Issues - Should we retire the catalog - accepted.pdf||273.8 kB||Adobe PDF|
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.