Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Comparing two career adaptability measures for career construction theory : relations with boundaryless mindset and protean career attitudes||Authors:||Chan, Kim Yin
Uy, Marilyn A.
Ho, Moon-Ho Ringo
Chernyshenko, Oleksandr S.
Yu, Kang Yang Trevor
|Keywords:||DRNTU::Business::Operations management::Business ethics||Issue Date:||2014||Source:||Chan, K. Y., Uy, M. A., Ho, M.-h. R., Sam, Y. L., Chernyshenko, O. S., & Yu, K. Y. T. (2015). Comparing two career adaptability measures for career construction theory : relations with boundaryless mindset and protean career attitudes. Journal of vocational behavior, 87, 22–31.||Series/Report no.:||Journal of vocational behavior||Abstract:||We examined the constructs underlying the Career Maturity Inventory-Adaptability Form (CMI-C) and the Career Adapt-Abilities Scale (CAAS). Data from 852 university students indicated that the second-order factors for both scales correlate .43, suggesting that they measure different yet related constructs. All three subscales of the CMI-C correlate most with the “concern” subscale of the CAAS rather than with the corresponding subscale. It appears that the CMI-C is a measure of particular career adaptability for choosing a career whereas the CAAS is a global measure of career adaptability for dealing with all of the tasks of vocational development across the life span. Regression analyses show that the CMI-C does not add to the prediction of boundaryless mindset and protean career attitudes over the CAAS. Relationships between the CMI-C and CAAS with entrepreneurial, professional, and leadership career motivation profiles showed that the CAAS is more strongly related to boundaryless mindset and protean career attitudes, while the CMI-C appears to relate to more traditional (professional and leadership) career motivations.||URI:||https://hdl.handle.net/10356/103754
|ISSN:||0001-8791||DOI:||10.1016/j.jvb.2014.11.006||Rights:||© 2014 Elsevier. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Journal of Vocational Behavior, Elsevier. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.11.006].||Fulltext Permission:||open||Fulltext Availability:||With Fulltext|
|Appears in Collections:||NBS Journal Articles|
Files in This Item:
|Blind_Manuscript_CMI_CAAS v2.0b_R&R_for_final check (1).pdf||528.52 kB||Adobe PDF|
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.