dc.contributor.authorCappello, Leonardo
dc.contributor.authorElangovan, Naveen
dc.contributor.authorContu, Sara
dc.contributor.authorKhosravani, Sanaz
dc.contributor.authorKonczak, Jürgen
dc.contributor.authorMasia, Lorenzo
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-20T03:56:48Z
dc.date.available2015-05-20T03:56:48Z
dc.date.copyright2015en_US
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationCappello, L., Elangovan, N., Contu, S., Khosravani, S., Konczak, J., & Masia, L. (2015). Robot-aided assessment of wrist proprioception. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 9.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1662-5161en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10220/25622
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Impaired proprioception severely affects the control of gross and fine motor function. However, clinical assessment of proprioceptive deficits and its impact on motor function has been difficult to elucidate. Recent advances in haptic robotic interfaces designed for sensorimotor rehabilitation enabled the use of such devices for the assessment of proprioceptive function. Purpose: This study evaluated the feasibility of a wrist robot system to determine proprioceptive discrimination thresholds for two different DoFs of the wrist. Specifically, we sought to accomplish three aims: first, to establish data validity; second, to show that the system is sensitive to detect small differences in acuity; third, to establish test–retest reliability over repeated testing. Methodology: Eleven healthy adult subjects experienced two passive wrist movements and had to verbally indicate which movement had the larger amplitude. Based on a subject’s response data, a psychometric function was fitted and the wrist acuity threshold was established at the 75% correct response level. A subset of five subjects repeated the experimentation three times (T1, T2, and T3) to determine the test–retest reliability. Results: Mean threshold for wrist flexion was 2.15°± 0.43° and 1.52°± 0.36° for abduction. Encoder resolutions were 0.0075°(flexion–extension) and 0.0032°(abduction–adduction). Motor resolutions were 0.2°(flexion–extension) and 0.3°(abduction–adduction). Reliability coefficients were rT2-T1 = 0.986 and rT3-T2 = 0.971. Conclusion: We currently lack established norm data on the proprioceptive acuity of the wrist to establish direct validity. However, the magnitude of our reported thresholds is physiological, plausible, and well in line with available threshold data obtained at the elbow joint. Moreover, system has high resolution and is sensitive enough to detect small differences in acuity. Finally, the system produces reliable data over repeated testing.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFrontiers in human neuroscienceen_US
dc.rights© 2015 Cappello, Elangovan, Contu, Khosravani, Konczak and Masia. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.en_US
dc.subjectDRNTU::Science::Biological sciences::Human anatomy and physiology::Neurobiology
dc.titleRobot-aided assessment of wrist proprioceptionen_US
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00198
dc.description.versionPublished versionen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record