Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Evaluation of the Effect of Trypsin Digestion Buffers on Artificial Deamidation||Authors:||Hao, Piliang
Tam, James P.
Sze, Siu Kwan
Trypsin digestion buffers
|Issue Date:||2014||Source:||Hao, P., Ren, Y., Datta, A., Tam, J. P., & Sze, S. K. (2015). Evaluation of the Effect of Trypsin Digestion Buffers on Artificial Deamidation. Journal of Proteome Research, 14(2), 1308-1314.||Series/Report no.:||Journal of Proteome Research||Abstract:||Nonenzymatic deamidation occurs readily under the condition of trypsin digestion, resulting in the identification of many artificial deamidation sites. To evaluate the effect of trypsin digestion buffers on artificial deamidation, we compared the three commonly used buffers Tris-HCl (pH 8), ammonium bicarbonate (ABC), and triethylammonium bicarbonate (TEAB), and ammonium acetate (pH 6), which was reported to reduce Asn deamidation. iTRAQ quantification on rat kidney tissue digested in these four buffers indicates that artificial Asn deamidation is produced in the order of ammonium acetate < Tris-HCl < ABC < TEAB, and Gln deamidation has no significant differences in all tested buffers. Label-free experiments show the same trend, while protein and unique peptide identification are comparable using these four buffers. To explain the differences of these four buffers in producing artificial Asn deamidation, we determined the half-life of Asn deamidation in these buffers using synthetic peptides containing -Asn-Gly- sequences. It is 51.4 ± 6.0 days in 50 mM of ammonium acetate (pH 6) at 37 °C, which is about 23, 104, and 137 times that in Tris-HCl, ABC, and TEAB buffers, respectively. In conclusion, ammonium acetate (pH 6) is more suitable than other tested buffers for characterizing endogenous deamidation and N-glycosylation.||URI:||https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81183
|DOI:||http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr500903b||Rights:||© 2014 American Chemical Society. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Journal of Proteome Research, American Chemical Society. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr500903b].||Fulltext Permission:||open||Fulltext Availability:||With Fulltext|
|Appears in Collections:||SBS Journal Articles|
SCELSE Journal Articles
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.