dc.contributor.authorSesagiri Raamkumar, Aravind
dc.contributor.authorFoo, Schubert
dc.contributor.authorPang, Natalie
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-29T02:06:44Z
dc.date.available2016-01-29T02:06:44Z
dc.date.issued2015-10-21
dc.identifier.citationAravind, S. R., Foo, S., & Pang, N. (2015). Comparison of Techniques for Measuring Research Coverage of Scientific Papers: A Case Study. 10th International Conference on Digital Information Management (ICDIM 2015), 132-137.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10220/39818
dc.description.abstractWith a plethora of research papers published all throughout the year, the task of measuring the research coverage of a paper has become ever-important. Different methods have been proposed for calculating coverage scores using the references and citations network of papers, based on coccurences techniques and graph ranking algorithms. In this paper, we propose two techniques for measuring coverage based on author-specified keywords in research papers. We evaluate these techniques with HITS-based coverage technique in a simple experiment using four paper-type inclusivity criteria. Results show that the proposed techniques perform better at providing higher scores for diverse, popular and recent papers while the HITS technique was better at identifying survey papers. The proposed techniques will be used in subsequent studies involving a task-based scientific paper recommender system. The theoretical and practical implications of this study are also been discussed in this paper.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNRF (Natl Research Foundation, S’pore)en_US
dc.format.extent6 p.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rights© 2015 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICDIM.2015.7381881].en_US
dc.subjectAuthor-specified keywordsen_US
dc.subjectCase study
dc.subjectCitation analysis
dc.subjectKeywords-based coverage
dc.subjectResearch coverage
dc.titleComparison of Techniques for Measuring Research Coverage of Scientific Papers: A Case Studyen_US
dc.typeConference Paper
dc.contributor.conference10th International Conference on Digital Information Management (ICDIM 2015)en_US
dc.contributor.schoolWee Kim Wee School of Communication and Informationen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICDIM.2015.7381881
dc.description.versionAccepted versionen_US
dc.contributor.organizationCentre of Social Media Innovations for Communities (COSMIC)en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record