Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88076
Title: | To Shoot Or Not To Shoot? Southeast Asian And Middle Eastern Militaries Respond Differently | Authors: | James M. Dorsey Teresita Cruz-Del Rosario |
Keywords: | DRNTU::Social sciences::Political science | Issue Date: | 2015 | Source: | James M. Dorsey & Teresita Cruz-Del Rosario. (2015). To Shoot Or Not To Shoot? Southeast Asian And Middle Eastern Militaries Respond Differently. (RSIS Working Paper, No. 295). Singapore: Nanyang Technological University. | Series/Report no.: | RSIS Working Papers, 295-15 | Abstract: | An analysis of the Middle Eastern and North African militaries has produced a laundry list of literature, much of which was either valid for a specific post-World War II period or highlighted one of more aspects of military interest in the status quo or attitudes towards political change. Leaving aside the geopolitical differences between Southeast Asia and the Middle East and North Africa, a comparison of the transition in both regions brings into focus the building blocks that are needed for an armed force to embrace change. Southeast Asian nations succeeded whereas the countries in Middle East and North Africa, with the exception of Tunisia, have failed for several reasons. Part of this working paper will be published in 2016 by Palgrave in 'Lost in Transition, Comparative Political Transitions in Southeast Asia and the Middle East' by Teresita Cruz- Del Rosario and James M. Dorsey. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88076 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/40005 |
Schools: | S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies | Rights: | Nanyang Technological University | Fulltext Permission: | open | Fulltext Availability: | With Fulltext |
Appears in Collections: | RSIS Working Papers |
Page view(s) 50
467
Updated on Mar 28, 2024
Download(s) 50
132
Updated on Mar 28, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.