Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/79718
Title: Against Time Bias
Authors: Greene, Preston
Sullivan, Meghan
Keywords: Philosophy
Issue Date: 2015
Source: Greene, P., & Sullivan, M. (2015). Against Time Bias. Ethics, 125(4), 947-970.
Series/Report no.: Ethics
Abstract: Most of us display a bias toward the near: we prefer pleasurable experiences to be in our near future and painful experiences to be in our distant future. We also display a bias toward the future: we prefer pleasurable experiences to be in our future and painful experiences to be in our past. While philosophers have tended to think that near bias is a rational defect, almost no one finds future bias objectionable. In this essay, we argue that this hybrid position is untenable. We conclude that those who reject near bias should instead endorse complete temporal neutrality.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/79718
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/40397
ISSN: 0014-1704
DOI: 10.1086/680910
Rights: © 2015 The University of Chicago. This paper was published in Ethics and is made available as an electronic reprint (preprint) with permission of The University of Chicago. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/680910]. One print or electronic copy may be made for personal use only. Systematic or multiple reproduction, distribution to multiple locations via electronic or other means, duplication of any material in this paper for a fee or for commercial purposes, or modification of the content of the paper is prohibited and is subject to penalties under law.
Fulltext Permission: open
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:HSS Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Greene and Sullivan, Against Time Bias.pdf331.2 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.