dc.contributor.authorComodi, Gabriele
dc.contributor.authorCarducci, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorSze, Jia Yin
dc.contributor.authorBalamurugan, Nagarajan
dc.contributor.authorRomagnoli, Alessandro
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-06T06:28:15Z
dc.date.available2017-06-06T06:28:15Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationComodi, G., Carducci, F., Sze, J. Y., Balamurugan, N., & Romagnoli, A. (2017). Storing energy for cooling demand management in tropical climates: A techno-economic comparison between different energy storage technologies. Energy, 121, 676-694.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0360-5442en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10220/42585
dc.description.abstractThis paper addresses the role of energy storage in cooling applications. Cold energy storage technologies addressed are: Li-Ion batteries (Li-Ion EES), sensible heat thermal energy storage (SHTES); phase change material (PCM TES), compressed air energy storage (CAES) and liquid air energy storage (LAES). Batteries and CAES are electrical storage systems which run the cooling systems; SHTES and PCM TES are thermal storage systems which directly store cold energy; LAES is assessed as a hybrid storage system which provides both electricity (for cooling) and cold energy. A hybrid quantitative-qualitative comparison is presented. Quantitative comparison was investigated for different sizes of daily cooling energy demand and three different tariff scenarios. A techno-economic analysis was performed to show the suitability of the different storage systems at different scales. Three parameters were used (Pay-back period, Savings-per-energy-unit and levelized-cost-of-energy) to analyze and compare the different scenarios. The qualitative analysis was based on five comparison criteria (Complexity, Technology Readiness Level, Sustainability, Flexibility and Safety). Results showed the importance of weighing the pros and cons of each technology to select a suitable cold energy storage system. Techno-economic analysis highlighted the fundamental role of tariff scenario: a greater difference between peak and off-peak electricity tariff leads to a shorter payback period of each technology.en_US
dc.format.extent68 p.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEnergyen_US
dc.rights© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Energy, Elsevier Ltd. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.038].en_US
dc.subjectCold thermal energy storageen_US
dc.subjectLiquid air energy storage (LAES)en_US
dc.titleStoring energy for cooling demand management in tropical climates: A techno-economic comparison between different energy storage technologiesen_US
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.038
dc.description.versionAccepted versionen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record