Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Revisiting responses to power preponderance : going beyond the balancing-bandwagoning dichotomy||Authors:||Chong, Ja Ian||Keywords:||DRNTU::Social sciences::Military and naval science||Issue Date:||2003||Source:||Chong, J. I. (2003). Revisiting responses to power preponderance : going beyond the balancing-bandwagoning dichotomy. (RSIS Working Paper, No. 54). Singapore: Nanyang Technological University.||Series/Report no.:||RSIS Working Papers ; 054/03||Abstract:||Since the 1990s, there has been a growing body of literature in international relations that looks at the unipolar world order that emerged from the ashes of the Cold War. Most of these works, however, tend to focus on describing the characteristics of this unipolar world or predicting its longevity. This working paper contends that such approaches do not pay adequate attention to how non-leading states in the international system are attempting to respond to American primacy of power in this age of unipolarity. The author argues that conventional conceptions of international politics that frame state reactions to superior power within the bounds of balancing and bandwagoning are inadequate to understand how state actors are trying to advance and preserve interests in relation to preponderant American power.||URI:||https://hdl.handle.net/10356/91719
|Rights:||Nanyang Technological University||Fulltext Permission:||open||Fulltext Availability:||With Fulltext|
|Appears in Collections:||RSIS Working Papers |
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.