Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/91399
Title: Testing alternative responses to power preponderance : buffering, binding, bonding and beleaguering in the real world
Authors: Chong, Ja Ian
Keywords: DRNTU::Social sciences::Military and naval science
Issue Date: 2004
Source: Chong, J. I. (2004). Testing alternative responses to power preponderance : buffering, binding, bonding and beleaguering in the real world. (RSIS Working Paper, No. 60). Singapore: Nanyang Technological University.
Series/Report no.: RSIS Working Papers ; 60/04
Abstract: In an earlier piece entitled, "Revisiting Responses to Power Preponderance: Beyond Balancing and Bandwagoning", the author developed four alternative resonses to power preponderance that fell outside the traditional international relations framework of balancing and bandwagoning. The four responses are namely binding, buffering, bonding and beleaguering. The previous work argued that states might broadly adopt these four responses to preponderant power depending on their relative power next to the leading state and the level of integration with the world system.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/91399
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/4459
Rights: Nanyang Technological University
Fulltext Permission: open
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:RSIS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RSIS-WORKPAPER_64.pdf566.14 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

Google ScholarTM

Check

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.