Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||A task-based scientific paper recommender system for literature review and manuscript preparation||Authors:||Sesagiri Raamkumar, Aravind||Keywords:||DRNTU::Library and information science::Libraries::Digital libraries and information portals
DRNTU::Library and information science::Libraries::Information retrieval and analysis
|Issue Date:||8-Oct-2018||Source:||Aravind, S. R. (2018). A task-based scientific paper recommender system for literature review and manuscript preparation. Doctoral thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.||Abstract:||In the domain of scholarly communication lifecycle, recommender systems have been built to provide research papers for researchers’ explicit and implicit information needs. Previous studies (Jardine, 2014; Mcnee, 2006) have employed an algorithmic approach of providing solutions to researcher’s tasks. The characteristics of the tasks, their inter-relationships and intra-relationships with algorithms have been largely ignored since the focus has mainly been to propose different recommendation techniques on top of a variety of algorithms. Driven by these research gaps, the overarching goal of this research is to build an assistive system for helping researchers in finding papers for key Literature Review (LR) and Manuscript Preparatory (MP) tasks. To achieve this goal, two research objectives are proposed. The first objective is to identify an appropriate method to map the identified LR and MP tasks to relevant algorithms. The deliverable for this objective is a prototype assistive system that provides recommendations for three tasks. The second research objective is to evaluate whether the performance of the proposed recommendation techniques and the overall system are at the expected level. To address the research objectives, the research is divided into two interrelated studies. In Study I, a university-wide survey was conducted on the topic of Inadequate and Omitted Citations in manuscripts (IOC). The 207 survey respondents were classified into manuscript reviewer and author groups. Survey results indicated that manuscript authors frequently miss citing seminal and topically-similar papers in journal manuscripts. The lack of experience in a specific research area was perceived as a major reason for IOC, followed by lack of overall research experience and the scenario of working in interdisciplinary research projects. Authors frequently needed external assistance in finding interdisciplinary and topically-similar papers for LR. Based on the findings, two LR search tasks of building reading list and finding topically similar papers were shortlisted. A third task meant to help researchers in identifying unique and important papers from their final reading list was selected, thereby making it a total of three tasks for the assistive system. A prototype called Rec4LRW (Recommendations for Literature Review and Writing) system was developed for providing recommendations for the shortlisted three tasks. The system development was guided by a threefold intervention framework comprising of (i) task redesign for addressing the algorithmic improvements, (ii) task interconnectivity addressing the management of papers between the tasks and (iii) informational display features in the system’s user-interface for expediting researcher’s relevance judgment decisions. The second research objective is addressed in Study II. As a part of Study II, an offline evaluation experiment and a user evaluation study were conducted. An extract of papers from the ACM Digital Library was used as the corpus for the evaluations. A total of 119 researchers who had experience in authoring research papers, participated in the user study. Predictors and correlates for the output quality measures were identified for each task. This study established the effectiveness of the three interventions in providing relevant recommendations. Graduate students and novice researchers found the recommendations and the overall system to be more useful and effective.||URI:||https://hdl.handle.net/10356/89406
|DOI:||https://doi.org/10.32657/10220/46243||Fulltext Permission:||open||Fulltext Availability:||With Fulltext|
|Appears in Collections:||WKWSCI Theses|
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.