dc.contributor.authorPili, Roberto
dc.contributor.authorRomagnoli, Alessandro
dc.contributor.authorSpliethoff, Hartmut
dc.contributor.authorWieland, Christoph
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-01T03:21:02Z
dc.date.available2018-11-01T03:21:02Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationPili, R., Romagnoli, A., Spliethoff, H., & Wieland, C. (2017). Techno-Economic Analysis of Waste Heat Recovery with ORC from Fluctuating Industrial Sources. Energy Procedia, 129, 503-510. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.170en_US
dc.identifier.issn1876-6102en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10220/46501
dc.description.abstractA significant portion of the consumed energy by the industrial sector is rejected as waste heat in the medium temperature range. Organic Rankine Cycles (ORC) are a valuable technology to recover the available waste heat at medium temperatures, and produce electricity or combined heat and power (CHP). A trade-off has to be found between the reduced environmental impact of an industrial site and investment costs for waste heat recovery (WHR). Very challenging for the WHR are the large fluctuations in temperature and/or mass flow rate. In the present work, the economic feasibility of industrial WHR with ORC is analyzed for different applications, with and without heat storage: hot air from clinker cooling (fluctuating heat source temperature), exhaust gas from rolling mill reheating furnace (fluctuating heat source mass flow rate) and a case of exhaust gas from electric arc furnace (both fluctuating heat source temperature and mass flow rate). The different configurations are developed and simulated by combining MATLAB® and EBSILON®Professional. A latent heat buffer with LiNO3 appeared to be the best option for WHR from cement clinker cooling. In case of rolling mill reheating furnace, a design for the minimum mass flow rate and bypass of any exceeding fluctuation appeared the most economical solution, whereas the best environmental performance was achieved for lower bypass of the heat source. In case of electric arc furnace, the best economic solution appeared to be without storage, even though the latent buffer could guarantee the highest CO2-savings. The described design and analysis method should help investors, designers and decision makers take better choices to increase the efficiency and improve the economy of industrial sites with ORC technology.en_US
dc.format.extent8 p.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEnergy Procediaen_US
dc.rights© 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_US
dc.subjectWaste Heat Recoveryen_US
dc.subjectORCen_US
dc.subjectDRNTU::Engineering::Mechanical engineeringen_US
dc.titleTechno-economic analysis of waste heat recovery with ORC from fluctuating industrial sourcesen_US
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.contributor.researchEnergy Research Institute @NTUen_US
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.schoolInterdisciplinary Graduate School (IGS)en_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.170
dc.description.versionPublished versionen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record