Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88906
Title: Case study of load-bearing precast wall system subject to low seismic intensity by linear and nonlinear analyses
Authors: Tiong, Patrick Liq Yee
Chiew, Sing Ping
Teow, Beng Hur
Keywords: DRNTU::Engineering::Civil engineering
Precast Wall
Low Seismicity
Issue Date: 2016
Source: Tiong, P. L. Y., Chiew, S. P., & Teow, B. H. (2016). Case study of load-bearing precast wall system subject to low seismic intensity by linear and nonlinear analyses. Case Studies in Structural Engineering, 6, 11-21. doi:10.1016/j.csse.2016.05.001
Series/Report no.: Case Studies in Structural Engineering
Abstract: This paper investigates the behaviour of load-bearing precast wall system (namely the HC Precast System − HCPS) subject to seismicity in Malaysia. Recent tremors felt across the country heeded the call for the need of seismic design guidelines to be implemented. For this study, the design ground acceleration for Malaysia has not been finalized. Throughout the years, several schools of thought that occurred among different researchers pertaining to the value of design ground acceleration, ranging from 0.05 g to 0.1 g. The implications of the selected values can be great especially in designing new buildings or retrofitting existing ones. Thus, linear analysis using Modal Response Spectrum Analysis (MRSA) and nonlinear pushover analysis of representative HCPS were performed for this study. The finite element (FE) model focused particularly on the nonlinear behaviour of the interface between a precast wall and cast in-situ column. Prior to the modal and pushover analyses, the FE model was validated against quasi-static cyclic test results of identical precast system obtained from literature. Differences between the MRSA and pushover approaches are presented and discussed. Performance levels of the structural system were subjected to three levels of design ground acceleration (0.05, 0.075 and 0.1 g) have been included.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88906
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/46989
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csse.2016.05.001
Rights: © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Fulltext Permission: open
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:CEE Journal Articles

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.