Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/90121
Title: Actualism doesn’t have control issues : a reply to Cohen and Timmerman
Authors: Forcehimes, Andrew T.
Semrau, Luke
Keywords: DRNTU::Humanities::Philosophy
Issue Date: 2018
Source: Forcehimes, A. T., & Semrau, L. (2019). Actualism doesn’t have control issues: a reply to Cohen and Timmerman. Philosophia, 47(1), 271-277. doi:10.1007/s11406-018-9957-x
Series/Report no.: Philosophia
Abstract: Recently, Cohen and Timmerman (Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy, 10(3), 1–18, 2016) argue that actualism has control issues. The view should be rejected, they claim, as it recognizes a morally irrelevant distinction between counterfactuals over which agents exercise the same kind of control. Here we reply on behalf of actualism.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/90121
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/48437
ISSN: 0048-3893
DOI: 10.1007/s11406-018-9957-x
Rights: © 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature. All rights reserved.
Fulltext Permission: none
Fulltext Availability: No Fulltext
Appears in Collections:SoH Journal Articles

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.