Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Dynamic and regression modeling of ocean variability in the tide-gauge record at seasonal and longer periods||Authors:||Hill, Emma M.
Davis, James L.
Ponte, Rui M.
|Keywords:||DRNTU::Science::Geology||Issue Date:||2007||Source:||Hill, E. M., Ponte, R. M., & Davis, J. L. (2007). Dynamic and regression modeling of ocean variability in the tide-gauge record at seasonal and longer periods. Journal of Geophysical Research, 112.||Series/Report no.:||Journal of geophysical research||Abstract:||Comparison of monthly mean tide-gauge time series to corresponding model time series based on a static inverted barometer (IB) for pressure-driven fluctuations and a ocean general circulation model (OM) reveals that the combined model successfully reproduces seasonal and interannual changes in relative sea level at many stations. Removal of the OM and IB from the tide-gauge record produces residual time series with a mean global variance reduction of 53%. The OM is mis-scaled for certain regions, and 68% of the residual time series contain a significant seasonal variability after removal of the OM and IB from the tide-gauge data. Including OM admittance parameters and seasonal coefficients in a regression model for each station, with IB also removed, produces residual time series with mean global variance reduction of 71%. Examination of the regional improvement in variance caused by scaling the OM, including seasonal terms, or both, indicates weakness in the model at predicting sea-level variation for constricted ocean regions. The model is particularly effective at reproducing sea-level variation for stations in North America, Europe, and Japan. The RMS residual for many stations in these areas is 25–35 mm. The production of “cleaner” tide-gauge time series, with oceanographic variability removed, is important for future analysis of nonsecular and regionally differing sea-level variations. Understanding the ocean model's strengths and weaknesses will allow for future improvements of the model.||URI:||https://hdl.handle.net/10356/95166
|DOI:||http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003745||Rights:||© 2007 American Geophysical Union.This paper was published in Journal of Geophysical Research and is made available as an electronic reprint (preprint) with permission of American Geophysical Union. The paper can be found at the following official URL: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003745]. One print or electronic copy may be made for personal use only. Systematic or multiple reproduction, distribution to multiple locations via electronic or other means, duplication of any material in this paper for a fee or for commercial purposes, or modification of the content of the paper is prohibited and is subject to penalties under law.||Fulltext Permission:||open||Fulltext Availability:||With Fulltext|
|Appears in Collections:||EOS Journal Articles|
Files in This Item:
|Dynamic and regression modeling of ocean variability in the tide- gauge record at seasonal and longer periods.pdf||1.47 MB||Adobe PDF|
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.