Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/100546
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChew, Kok Honen
dc.contributor.authorNg, E. Y. K.en
dc.contributor.authorTai, Kangen
dc.contributor.authorMuskulus, Michaelen
dc.contributor.authorZwick, Danielen
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-29T03:38:09Zen
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-06T20:24:16Z-
dc.date.available2014-10-29T03:38:09Zen
dc.date.available2019-12-06T20:24:16Z-
dc.date.copyright2014en
dc.date.issued2014en
dc.identifier.citationChew, K. H., Ng, E. Y. K., Tai, K., Muskulus, M., & Zwick, D. (2014). Offshore wind turbine jacket substructure : a comparison study between four-legged and three-legged designs. Journal of ocean and wind energy, 1(2), 74-81.en
dc.identifier.issn2310-3604en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/100546-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10220/24149en
dc.description.abstractA comparison study was conducted between a conventional four-legged and a newly-developed three-legged bottom fixed jacket substructure for offshore wind applications. Fatigue (FLS) and ultimate limit state (ULS) analyses were performed, and results show that the three-legged concept is feasible as an interesting alternative to the four-legged design, while potentially more cost-efficient, with a 17-percent reduction of structural mass and a 25-percent reduction in the number of welded joints. Further analyses were carried out to evaluate the sensitivity of the dynamic performance with respect to different load cases, loading directionality, and wind-wave misalignment effects. Results show that both designs are highly susceptible to the change-of-load direction, therefore recommending a finer incident angle resolution (a gap of 15 degrees or less) to be used in the analysis. The overall wind-wave misalignment effect is comparably smaller, but could contribute to a significant impact if the joints are close to being critical.en
dc.description.sponsorshipEDB (Economic Devt. Board, S’pore)en
dc.format.extent8 p.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of ocean and wind energyen
dc.rights© 2014 The International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers.en
dc.subjectDRNTU::Engineering::Civil engineering::Structures and designen
dc.subjectDRNTU::Engineering::Mechanical engineering::Alternative, renewable energy sourcesen
dc.titleOffshore wind turbine jacket substructure : a comparison study between four-legged and three-legged designsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineeringen
dc.contributor.organizationDNV GLen
dc.contributor.researchEnergy Research Groupen
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.isope.org/publications/jowe/jowe-01-2/abst-01-2-p074-jc-r-09-Chew.pdfen
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:MAE Journal Articles

Google ScholarTM

Check

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.