Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLeong, Ping Alvinen
dc.identifier.citationLeong, P. A. (2000). The inference-boundary model reinterpreting theme and rheme. Language sciences, 22(1), 1-26.en
dc.description.abstractThe Hallidayan notions of theme and rheme pose an interesting challenge to linguists in their attempts to pin them down more specifically. This paper argues that since the thematic structure of the clause organises it as a message, a useful starting point in theme–rheme research is an understanding of how clausal messages are typically processed by language users. A cognitive psychological model is constructed in this paper. It views theme as an element that generates a boundary of acceptability within which it is permissible for the rheme to occur. Underlying the thematic structure of the clause is a principle dictating that the theme must be acceptably developed by the rheme. This principle forms the basis of a test to identify and delimit the thematic head.en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLanguage sciencesen
dc.rights© 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Language Sciences, Elsevier Science Ltd. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [DOI:].en
dc.subjectDRNTU::Social sciences::Psychologyen
dc.titleThe inference-boundary model reinterpreting theme and rhemeen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Humanities and Social Sciencesen
dc.contributor.researchLanguage and Communication Centreen
dc.description.versionAccepted versionen
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:HSS Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
The inference-boundary model Reinterpreting theme and rheme.pdf290.78 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail

Citations 5

checked on Sep 5, 2020

Page view(s)

checked on Sep 24, 2020


checked on Sep 24, 2020

Google ScholarTM




Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.