Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Validity of six openness facets in predicting work behaviors : a meta-analysis||Authors:||Chernyshenko, Oleksandr S.
Stark, Stephen E.
Woo, Sang Eun
|Keywords:||DRNTU::Business||Issue Date:||2013||Source:||Woo, S. E., Chernyshenko, O. S., Stark, S. E., & Conz, G. (2013). Validity of six openness facets in predicting work behaviors : a meta-analysis. Journal of personality assessment, in press.||Series/Report no.:||Journal of personality assessment||Abstract:||To illustrate the importance of facet-level investigations in predicting organizational outcomes and the need for more primary studies on this topic, we conducted a meta-analysis that took an exploratory look at differential relationships among 7 organizational criteria and Openness traits varying in breadth. Nine Openness predictors—the global dimension, 2 aspects (intellect and culture), and 6 facets (intellectual efficiency, ingenuity, curiosity, aesthetics, tolerance, and depth)—were examined in relations with various organizational criteria such as traditional performance outcomes (task performance, contextual performance, counterproductive work behavior), turnover, leadership effectiveness, training performance, and adaptive performance. Our results support the idea that Openness facets could exhibit differential validity for many organizational outcomes.||URI:||https://hdl.handle.net/10356/101090
|ISSN:||0022-3891||DOI:||10.1080/00223891.2013.806329||Fulltext Permission:||none||Fulltext Availability:||No Fulltext|
|Appears in Collections:||NBS Journal Articles|
Updated on Sep 6, 2020
Updated on Mar 6, 2021
Page view(s) 10643
Updated on May 26, 2022
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.