Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCmor, Dianneen
dc.contributor.authorLitwan, Roryen
dc.identifier.citationCmor, D. & Litwan, R. (2014). Should we retire the catalog? Reference & user services quarterly, 53(3), 213-216.en
dc.description.abstractAs more libraries adopt web-scale discovery services, many now find themselves offering two options for searching their holdings: the new discovery tool and the traditional OPAC. Are both necessary? Or does a discovery system by itself provide an adequate search environment, making the catalog superfluous? In this installment of “Taking Issues,” Dianne Cmor argues that investing in two search tools is an unwise use of limited resources. Rory Litwin counters that the direct control traditional OPACs offer is a necessity for librarians and other advanced researchers.en
dc.format.extent4 p.en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesReference & user services quarterlyen
dc.rights© 2014 American Library Association. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Reference & User Services Quarterly, American Library Association. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [].en
dc.subjectDRNTU::Library and information science::Libraries::Information retrieval and analysisen
dc.titleShould we retire the catalog?en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.description.versionAccepted versionen
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:LIB Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RUSQ Taking Issues - Should we retire the catalog - accepted.pdf273.8 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail

Google ScholarTM



Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.