Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: mHealth adoption in low-resource environments : a review of the use of mobile healthcare in developing countries
Authors: Chib, Arul
van Velthoven, Michelle Helena
Car, Josip
Keywords: DRNTU::Social sciences::Communication
Issue Date: 2014
Source: Chib, A., van Velthoven, M. H., & Car, J. (2014). mHealth Adoption in Low-Resource Environments: A Review of the Use of Mobile Healthcare in Developing Countries. Journal of Health Communication, in press.
Series/Report no.: Journal of health communication
Abstract: The acknowledged potential of using mobile phones for improving healthcare in low-resource environments of developing countries has yet to translate into significant mHealth policy investment. The low uptake of mHealth in policy agendas may stem from a lack of evidence of the scalable, sustainable impact on health indicators. The mHealth literature in low- and middle-income countries reveals a burgeoning body of knowledge; yet existing reviews suggest that the projects yields mixed results. This paper adopts a stage-based approach to understand the varied contributions to mHealth research. The heuristic of input-mechanism-outputs is proposed as a tool to categorize mHealth studies. This review (63 papers comprising 53 studies) reveals that mHealth studies in developing countries tend to concentrate on specific stages, principally on pilot projects that adopt a deterministic approach to technological inputs [n=2], namely introduction and implementation. Somewhat less studied research designs that demonstrate evidence of outputs [n=15], such as improvements in healthcare processes and public health indicators. The review finds a lack of emphasis on studies that provide theoretical understanding of adoption and appropriation of technological introduction that produces measurable health outcomes. As a result, there is a lack of dominant theory, or measures of outputs relevant to making policy decisions. Future work needs to aim for establishing theoretical and measurement standards, particularly from social scientific perspectives, in collaboration with researchers from the domains of information technology and public health. Priorities should be set for investments and guidance in evaluation disseminated by the scientific community to practitioners and policymakers.
DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2013.864735
Rights: © 2014 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Journal of Health Communication, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [].
Fulltext Permission: open
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:WKWSCI Journal Articles

Citations 1

Updated on Jan 14, 2023

Web of ScienceTM
Citations 1

Updated on Jan 27, 2023

Page view(s) 20

Updated on Jan 28, 2023

Download(s) 1

Updated on Jan 28, 2023

Google ScholarTM




Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.