Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/103530
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYeung, Sai Hoen
dc.contributor.authorPradhan, Raunaqen
dc.contributor.authorFeng, Xiaohuaen
dc.contributor.authorZheng, Yuanjinen
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-25T07:05:56Zen
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-06T21:14:41Z-
dc.date.available2015-09-25T07:05:56Zen
dc.date.available2019-12-06T21:14:41Z-
dc.date.copyright2015en
dc.date.issued2015en
dc.identifier.citationYeung, S. H., Pradhan, R., Feng, X., & Zheng, Y. (2015). Comparing the magnetic resonant coupling radiofrequency stimulation to the traditional approaches: Ex-vivo tissue voltage measurement and electromagnetic simulation analysis. AIP Advances, 5(9), 097110-.en
dc.identifier.issn2158-3226en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/103530-
dc.description.abstractRecently, the design concept of magnetic resonant coupling has been adapted to electromagnetic therapy applications such as non-invasive radiofrequency (RF) stimulation. This technique can significantly increase the electric field radiated from the magnetic coil at the stimulation target, and hence enhancing the current flowing through the nerve, thus enabling stimulation. In this paper, the developed magnetic resonant coupling (MRC) stimulation, magnetic stimulation (MS) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) are compared. The differences between the MRC RF stimulation and other techniques are presented in terms of the operating mechanism, ex-vivo tissue voltage measurement and electromagnetic simulation analysis. The ev-vivo tissue voltage measurement experiment is performed on the compared devices based on measuring the voltage induced by electromagnetic induction at the tissue. The focusing effect, E field and voltage induced across the tissue, and the attenuation due to the increase of separation between the coil and the target are analyzed. The electromagnetic stimulation will also be performed to obtain the electric field and magnetic field distribution around the biological medium. The electric field intensity is proportional to the induced current and the magnetic field is corresponding to the electromagnetic induction across the biological medium. The comparison between the MRC RF stimulator and the MS and TENS devices revealed that the MRC RF stimulator has several advantages over the others for the applications of inducing current in the biological medium for stimulation purposes.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAIP Advancesen
dc.rights© 2015 The Author(s) (published by American Institute of Physics). This paper was published in AIP Advances and is made available as an electronic reprint (preprint) with permission of The Author(s) (published by American Institute of Physics). The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4930533]. One print or electronic copy may be made for personal use only. Systematic or multiple reproduction, distribution to multiple locations via electronic or other means, duplication of any material in this paper for a fee or for commercial purposes, or modification of the content of the paper is prohibited and is subject to penalties under law.en
dc.titleComparing the magnetic resonant coupling radiofrequency stimulation to the traditional approaches: Ex-vivo tissue voltage measurement and electromagnetic simulation analysisen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineeringen
dc.identifier.doi10.1063/1.4930533en
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:EEE Journal Articles

Page view(s)

292
checked on Sep 25, 2020

Download(s)

111
checked on Sep 25, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.