Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/104085
Title: Wahhabism vs. Wahhabism : Qatar challenges Saudi Arabia
Authors: James M. Dorsey
Keywords: DRNTU::Social sciences::Political science::International relations
Issue Date: 2013
Source: James M. Dorsey. (2013). Wahhabism vs. Wahhabism : Qatar challenges Saudi Arabia. (RSIS Working Paper, No. 262). Singapore: Nanyang Technological University.
Series/Report no.: RSIS Working paper, 262-13
Abstract: Qatar, a tiny energy-rich state in terms of territory and population, has exploded on to the world map as a major rival to the region’s behemoth, Saudi Arabia. By projecting itself through an activist foreign policy, an acclaimed and at times controversial global broadcaster, an airline that has turned it into a transportation hub and a host of mega sporting events, Qatar has sought to develop the soft power needed to compensate for its inability to ensure its security, safety and defence militarily. In doing so, it has demonstrated that size no longer necessarily is the determining factor for a state’s ability to enhance its influence and power. Its challenge to Saudi Arabia is magnified by the fact that it alongside the kingdom is the world’s only state that adheres to Wahhabism, an austere interpretation in Islam. Qatari conservatism is however everything but a mirror image of Saudi Arabia’s stark way of life with its powerful, conservative clergy, absolute gender segregation; total ban on alcohol and houses of worship for adherents of other religions, and refusal to accommodate alternative lifestyles or religious practices. Qatar’s alternative adaptation of Wahhabism coupled with its lack of an indigenous clergy and long-standing relationship with the Muslim Brotherhood, the region’s only organised opposition force, complicate its relationship with Saudi Arabia and elevate it to a potentially serious threat.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/104085
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/20056
Schools: S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies 
Rights: NTU
Fulltext Permission: open
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:RSIS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
WP262.pdf911.84 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

Page view(s) 20

818
Updated on Mar 25, 2025

Download(s) 5

1,220
Updated on Mar 25, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.