Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Interventions for improving patients’ trust in doctors and groups of doctors
Authors: Rolfe, Alix
Cash-Gibson, Lucinda
Car, Josip
Sheikh, Aziz
McKinstry, Brian
Keywords: DRNTU::Science::Medicine
Issue Date: 2014
Source: Rolfe, A., Cash-Gibson, L., Car, J., Sheikh, A., & McKinstry, B. (2014). Interventions for improving patients' trust in doctors and groups of doctors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2014(3), CD004134.
Series/Report no.: Cochrane database of systematic reviews
Abstract: Background: Trust is a fundamental component of the patient-doctor relationship and is associated with increased satisfaction, adherence to treatment, and continuity of care. Our 2006 review found little evidence that interventions improve patients' trust in their doctor; therefore an updated search was required to find out if there is further evidence of the effects of interventions that may improve trust in doctors or groups of doctors. Objectives: To update our earlier review assessing the effects of interventions intended to improve patients' trust in doctors or a group of doctors. Search methods: In 2003 we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Health Star, PsycINFO, CINAHL, LILACS, African Trials Register, African Health Anthology, Dissertation Abstracts International and the bibliographies of studies selected for inclusion. We also contacted researchers active in the field. We updated and re-ran the searches on available original databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library issue 2, 2013), MEDLINE (OvidSP), EMBASE (OvidSP), PsycINFO (OvidSP), CINAHL (Ebsco)) as well as Proquest Dissertations and Current Contents for the period 2003 to 18 March 2013. Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-randomised controlled trials, controlled before and after studies, and interrupted time series of interventions (informative, educational, behavioural, organisational) directed at doctors or patients (or carers) where trust was assessed as a primary or secondary outcome. Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Where mentioned, we extracted data on adverse effects. We synthesised data narratively. Main results: We included 10 randomised controlled trials (including 7 new trials) involving 11,063 patients. These studies were all undertaken in North America, and all but two involved primary care. As expected, there was considerable heterogeneity between the studies. Interventions were of three main types; three employed additional physician training, four were education for patients and three provided additional information about doctors in terms of financial incentives or consulting style. Additionally, several different measures of trust were employed. Authors' conclusions: Overall, there remains insufficient evidence to conclude that any intervention may increase or decrease trust in doctors. This may be due in part to the sensitivity of trust instruments, and a ceiling effect, as trust in doctors is generally high. It may be that current measures of trust are insufficiently sensitive. Further trials are required to explore the impact of doctors' specific training or the use of a patient-centred or decision-sharing approach on patients' trust, especially in the areas of healthcare provider choice, and induction into healthcare organisation. International trials would be of particular benefit. The review was constrained by the lack of consistency between trust measurements, timeframes and populations.
ISSN: 1469-493X
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004134.pub3
Rights: © 2014 The Cochrane Collaboration. This paper was published in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and is made available as an electronic reprint (preprint) with permission of The Cochrane Collaboration. The paper can be found at the following official DOI:  One print or electronic copy may be made for personal use only. Systematic or multiple reproduction, distribution to multiple locations via electronic or other means, duplication of any material in this paper for a fee or for commercial purposes, or modification of the content of the paper is prohibited and is subject to penalties under law.
Fulltext Permission: open
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:LKCMedicine Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Interventions for improving patients' trust in doctors and groups of doctors.pdfMain article617.45 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail

Citations 5

Updated on Sep 7, 2020

Web of ScienceTM
Citations 5

Updated on Feb 24, 2021

Page view(s) 20

Updated on Sep 28, 2022

Download(s) 5

Updated on Sep 28, 2022

Google ScholarTM




Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.