Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/104566
Title: | Environmental efficiency analysis of port cities : slacks-based measure data envelopment analysis approach | Authors: | Lee, Taehwee Yeo, Gi-Tae Thai, Vinh V |
Keywords: | DRNTU::Engineering::Maritime studies::Maritime management and business | Issue Date: | 2014 | Source: | Lee, T., Yeo, G. T., & Thai, V. V. (2014). Environmental efficiency analysis of port cities: Slacks-based measure data envelopment analysis approach. Transport Policy, 33, 82-88. | Series/Report no.: | Transport policy | Abstract: | Because ports have been rapidly expanding, port cities have been exposed to air pollution. Air pollution in port cities that has resulted from the intense expansion of ports has become a pressing concern. Although several studies have discussed the relationship between port and city functions and a few studies have attempted to consider ports׳ environmental performance using the data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach, none have examined emerging port city issues like their environmental influence in great detail. To address these gaps, a slacks-based data envelopment analysis (SBM-DEA) model was used in this paper to assess the environmental efficiency of port cities. The labor population in respective port cities was selected as the input variable, and gross regional domestic product (GRDP) and container throughput were used as the desirable output variables. As the undesirable output variables, nitrogen oxide (NOx), sulfur oxide (SO2), and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions were selected in the model. The results showed that Singapore, Busan, Rotterdam, Kaohsiung, Antwerp, and New York are the most environmentally efficient port cities, while Tianjin is the least environmentally efficient. The social and opportunity costs for air pollutants emissions in low efficient port cities were calculated as well. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/104566 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/20258 |
ISSN: | 0967-070X | DOI: | 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.02.009 | Schools: | School of Civil and Environmental Engineering | Rights: | © 2014 Elsevier. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Transport Policy, Elsevier. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.02.009. | Fulltext Permission: | open | Fulltext Availability: | With Fulltext |
Appears in Collections: | CEE Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1_Manuscript.pdf | 206.25 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
5
122
Updated on Mar 8, 2025
Web of ScienceTM
Citations
5
95
Updated on Oct 30, 2023
Page view(s) 10
896
Updated on Mar 14, 2025
Download(s) 5
798
Updated on Mar 14, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.