Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/105048
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLeong, Ping Alvinen
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-28T06:14:02Zen
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-06T21:45:05Z-
dc.date.available2014-08-28T06:14:02Zen
dc.date.available2019-12-06T21:45:05Z-
dc.date.copyright2014en
dc.date.issued2014en
dc.identifier.citationLeong, P. A. (2014). The passive voice in scientific writing. The current norm in science journals. Journal of science communication, 13(1), 1-16.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/105048-
dc.description.abstractIn contrast to past consensus, many authors now feel that the passive voice compromises the quality of scientific writing. However, studies involving scientific articles are rare. Using a corpus of 60 scientific research articles from six journals, this study examined the proportion of passives used, and the contexts and forms in which they occurred. The results revealed that about 30% of all clauses were passive clauses. The canonical form was most pervasive, followed by the bare passive; together, they constituted more than a quarter of all clauses analyzed. Passives were typically used in main clauses, followed by relative and adverbial clauses. Roughly 29% of all passives were located in the methodology section. Based on the results, the proportion of passives in scientific writing may stabilize at about 30%. It is unlikely to dramatically drop any further since the trend suggests that passives are still widely used in the methodology section.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of science communicationen
dc.rights© 2014 The Author(s)(Published by International School for Advanced Studies(SISSA)). This paper was published in Journal of Science Communication and is made available as an electronic reprint (preprint) with permission of The Author(s)(Published by International School for Advanced Studies(SISSA)). The paper can be found at the following official DOI: [http://jcom.sissa.it/archive/13/01/JCOM_1301_2014_A03]. One print or electronic copy may be made for personal use only. Systematic or multiple reproduction, distribution to multiple locations via electronic or other means, duplication of any material in this paper for a fee or for commercial purposes, or modification of the content of the paper is prohibited and is subject to penalties under law.en
dc.subjectDRNTU::Social sciences::Communicationen
dc.titleThe passive voice in scientific writing. The current norm in science journalsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Humanities and Social Sciencesen
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://jcom.sissa.it/archive/13/01/JCOM_1301_2014_A03en
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:HSS Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
The passive voice in scientific writing. The current norm in science journals.pdf196.96 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

Page view(s) 5

1,042
Updated on Oct 28, 2021

Download(s) 1

2,919
Updated on Oct 28, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.