Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/105362
Title: | Development and application of relevance and reliability criteria for water treatment removal efficiencies of chemicals of emerging concern | Authors: | Fischer, Astrid van Wezel, Annemarie P. Hollender, Juliane Cornelissen, Emile Hofman, Roberta van der Hoek, Jan Peter |
Keywords: | Data Evaluation Criteria Chemicals of Emerging Concern Engineering::Environmental engineering |
Issue Date: | 2019 | Source: | Fischer, A., van Wezel, A. P., Hollender, J., Cornelissen, E., Hofman, R., & van der Hoek, J. P. (2019). Development and application of relevance and reliability criteria for water treatment removal efficiencies of chemicals of emerging concern. Water Research, 161, 274-287. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2019.05.088 | Series/Report no.: | Water Research | Abstract: | With the growth in production and use of chemicals and the fact that many end up in the aquatic environment, there is an increasing need for advanced water treatment technologies that can remove chemicals of emerging concern (CECs) from water. The current lack of a homogenous approach for testing advanced water treatment technologies hampers the interpretation and evaluation of CEC removal efficiency data, and hinders informed decision making by stakeholders with regard to which treatment technology could satisfy their specific needs. Here a data evaluation framework is proposed to improve the use of current knowledge in the field of advanced water treatment technologies for drinking water and wastewater, consisting of a set of 9 relevance criteria and 51 reliability criteria. The two criteria sets underpin a thorough, unbiased and standardised method to select studies to evaluate and compare CEC removal efficiency of advanced water treatment technologies in a scientifically sound way. The relevance criteria set was applied to 244 papers on removal efficiency, of which only 20% fulfilled the criteria. The reliability criteria were applied to the remaining papers. In general these criteria were fulfilled with regards to information on the target compound, the water matrix and the treatment process conditions. However, there was a lack of information on data interpretation and statistics. In conclusion, a minority of the evaluated papers are suited for comparison across techniques, compounds and water matrixes. There is a clear need for more uniform reporting of water treatment studies for CEC removal. In the future this will benefit the selection of appropriate technologies. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/105362 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/49538 |
ISSN: | 0043-1354 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.watres.2019.05.088 | Research Centres: | Nanyang Environment and Water Research Institute Singapore Membrane Technology Centre |
Rights: | © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). | Fulltext Permission: | open | Fulltext Availability: | With Fulltext |
Appears in Collections: | NEWRI Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Development and application of relevance and reliability criteria for water treatment removal efficiencies of chemicals of emerging concern.pdf | 552.13 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
20
25
Updated on Mar 13, 2025
Web of ScienceTM
Citations
20
19
Updated on Oct 25, 2023
Page view(s)
357
Updated on Mar 19, 2025
Download(s) 50
108
Updated on Mar 19, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.