Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/105365
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Styles, Suzy J. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Gawne, Lauren | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-05T08:09:26Z | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-12-06T21:50:02Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-05T08:09:26Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2019-12-06T21:50:02Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Styles, S. J., & Gawne, L. (2017). When Does Maluma/Takete Fail? Two Key Failures and a Meta-Analysis Suggest That Phonology and Phonotactics Matter. i-Perception, 8(4), 1-17. doi:10.1177/2041669517724807 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/105365 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Eighty-seven years ago, Köhler reported that the majority of students picked the same answer in a quiz: Which novel word form (‘maluma’ or ‘takete’) went best with which abstract line drawing (one curved, one angular). Others have consistently shown the effect in a variety of contexts, with only one reported failure by Rogers and Ross. In the spirit of transparency, we report our own failure in the same journal. In our study, speakers of Syuba, from the Himalaya in Nepal, do not show a preference when matching word forms ‘kiki’ and ‘bubu’ to spiky versus curvy shapes. We conducted a meta-analysis of previous studies to investigate the relationship between pseudoword legality and task effects. Our combined analyses suggest a common source for both of the failures: ‘wordiness’ – We believe these tests fail when the test words do not behave according to the sound structure of the target language. | en |
dc.format.extent | 17 p. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | i-Perception | en |
dc.rights | © 2017 The Author(s). Creative Commons CC-BY: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). | en |
dc.subject | Cross-cultural Perception | en |
dc.subject | Cross-modal Congruence | en |
dc.subject | Social sciences::Psychology | en |
dc.title | When does maluma/takete fail? two key failures and a meta-analysis suggest that phonology and phonotactics matter | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.contributor.school | School of Social Sciences | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/2041669517724807 | en |
dc.description.version | Published version | en |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
Appears in Collections: | SSS Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
When Does MalumaTakete.pdf | 577.93 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
5
65
Updated on Sep 29, 2024
Web of ScienceTM
Citations
5
59
Updated on Oct 28, 2023
Page view(s)
420
Updated on Oct 3, 2024
Download(s) 50
99
Updated on Oct 3, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.