Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/105365
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStyles, Suzy J.en
dc.contributor.authorGawne, Laurenen
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-05T08:09:26Zen
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-06T21:50:02Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-05T08:09:26Zen
dc.date.available2019-12-06T21:50:02Z-
dc.date.issued2017en
dc.identifier.citationStyles, S. J., & Gawne, L. (2017). When Does Maluma/Takete Fail? Two Key Failures and a Meta-Analysis Suggest That Phonology and Phonotactics Matter. i-Perception, 8(4), 1-17. doi:10.1177/2041669517724807en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/105365-
dc.description.abstractEighty-seven years ago, Köhler reported that the majority of students picked the same answer in a quiz: Which novel word form (‘maluma’ or ‘takete’) went best with which abstract line drawing (one curved, one angular). Others have consistently shown the effect in a variety of contexts, with only one reported failure by Rogers and Ross. In the spirit of transparency, we report our own failure in the same journal. In our study, speakers of Syuba, from the Himalaya in Nepal, do not show a preference when matching word forms ‘kiki’ and ‘bubu’ to spiky versus curvy shapes. We conducted a meta-analysis of previous studies to investigate the relationship between pseudoword legality and task effects. Our combined analyses suggest a common source for both of the failures: ‘wordiness’ – We believe these tests fail when the test words do not behave according to the sound structure of the target language.en
dc.format.extent17 p.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesi-Perceptionen
dc.rights© 2017 The Author(s). Creative Commons CC-BY: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).en
dc.subjectCross-cultural Perceptionen
dc.subjectCross-modal Congruenceen
dc.subjectSocial sciences::Psychologyen
dc.titleWhen does maluma/takete fail? two key failures and a meta-analysis suggest that phonology and phonotactics matteren
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Social Sciencesen
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/2041669517724807en
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:SSS Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
When Does MalumaTakete.pdf577.93 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 5

65
Updated on Sep 29, 2024

Web of ScienceTM
Citations 5

59
Updated on Oct 28, 2023

Page view(s)

420
Updated on Oct 3, 2024

Download(s) 50

99
Updated on Oct 3, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.