Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/105902
Title: | Performance comparison of heat exchangers with different circuitry arrangements for active chilled beam applications | Authors: | Chen, Can Cai, Wenjian Wang, Youyi Lin, Chen |
Keywords: | DRNTU::Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering::Control and instrumentation | Issue Date: | 2014 | Source: | Chen, C., Cai, W., Wang, Y., & Lin, C. (2014). Performance comparison of heat exchangers with different circuitry arrangements for active chilled beam applications. Energy and buildings, 79, 164-172. | Series/Report no.: | Energy and buildings | Abstract: | This paper presents a performance comparison study of heat exchangers with different circuitry arrangements for active chilled beam (ACB) applications. Supported by a two-way discharge ACB terminal unit and a performance test pilot plant, four 2-rows plain fin and tube heat exchangers, namely, 1-circuit, 2-circuits, 4-circuits, and 8-circuits, are investigated under a wide range of chilled water volume flow rates. The chilled water side thermal and hydraulic characteristics are evaluated. The heat transfer rates are compared under three sets of criteria: identical water volume flow rate, identical pressure drop, and identical pumping energy consumption. Meanwhile, the comparisons are also performed in terms of two non-dimensional parameters: heat exchanger effectiveness and performance index. The study shows that different circuitry arrangements should be preferred in different operation conditions and under different evaluation criteria, while the 2-circuits arrangement is the most comprehensive and reasonable option rather than the 1-circuit one that is widely used in all available ACB products. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/105902 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/20952 |
ISSN: | 0378-7788 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.04.048 | Rights: | © 2014 Elsevier. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Energy and Buildings, Elsevier. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.04.048]. | Fulltext Permission: | open | Fulltext Availability: | With Fulltext |
Appears in Collections: | EEE Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Performance comparison of heat exchangers .pdf | 1.3 MB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
20
20
Updated on Jan 29, 2023
Web of ScienceTM
Citations
20
18
Updated on Jan 30, 2023
Page view(s) 20
647
Updated on Jan 28, 2023
Download(s) 20
229
Updated on Jan 28, 2023
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.