Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/107370
Title: Robot-aided assessment of wrist proprioception
Authors: Konczak, Jürgen
Cappello, Leonardo
Elangovan, Naveen
Contu, Sara
Khosravani, Sanaz
Masia, Lorenzo
Keywords: DRNTU::Science::Biological sciences::Human anatomy and physiology::Neurobiology
Issue Date: 2015
Source: Cappello, L., Elangovan, N., Contu, S., Khosravani, S., Konczak, J., & Masia, L. (2015). Robot-aided assessment of wrist proprioception. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 9.
Series/Report no.: Frontiers in human neuroscience
Abstract: Introduction: Impaired proprioception severely affects the control of gross and fine motor function. However, clinical assessment of proprioceptive deficits and its impact on motor function has been difficult to elucidate. Recent advances in haptic robotic interfaces designed for sensorimotor rehabilitation enabled the use of such devices for the assessment of proprioceptive function. Purpose: This study evaluated the feasibility of a wrist robot system to determine proprioceptive discrimination thresholds for two different DoFs of the wrist. Specifically, we sought to accomplish three aims: first, to establish data validity; second, to show that the system is sensitive to detect small differences in acuity; third, to establish test–retest reliability over repeated testing. Methodology: Eleven healthy adult subjects experienced two passive wrist movements and had to verbally indicate which movement had the larger amplitude. Based on a subject’s response data, a psychometric function was fitted and the wrist acuity threshold was established at the 75% correct response level. A subset of five subjects repeated the experimentation three times (T1, T2, and T3) to determine the test–retest reliability. Results: Mean threshold for wrist flexion was 2.15°± 0.43° and 1.52°± 0.36° for abduction. Encoder resolutions were 0.0075°(flexion–extension) and 0.0032°(abduction–adduction). Motor resolutions were 0.2°(flexion–extension) and 0.3°(abduction–adduction). Reliability coefficients were rT2-T1 = 0.986 and rT3-T2 = 0.971. Conclusion: We currently lack established norm data on the proprioceptive acuity of the wrist to establish direct validity. However, the magnitude of our reported thresholds is physiological, plausible, and well in line with available threshold data obtained at the elbow joint. Moreover, system has high resolution and is sensitive enough to detect small differences in acuity. Finally, the system produces reliable data over repeated testing.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/107370
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/25622
ISSN: 1662-5161
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00198
Schools: School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 
Rights: © 2015 Cappello, Elangovan, Contu, Khosravani, Konczak and Masia. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Fulltext Permission: open
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:MAE Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Robot-aided assessment of wrist proprioception.pdf1.26 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 5

93
Updated on Mar 16, 2025

Web of ScienceTM
Citations 5

69
Updated on Oct 24, 2023

Page view(s) 20

717
Updated on Mar 21, 2025

Download(s) 20

276
Updated on Mar 21, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.