Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/107409
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChua, Alton Yeow Kuanen
dc.contributor.authorBanerjee, Snehasishen
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-28T01:05:14Zen
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-06T22:30:24Z-
dc.date.available2015-04-28T01:05:14Zen
dc.date.available2019-12-06T22:30:24Z-
dc.date.copyright2015en
dc.date.issued2015en
dc.identifier.citationChua, A. Y. K., & Banerjee, S. (2015). Measuring the effectiveness of answers in Yahoo! Answers. Online information review, 39(1), 104-118.en
dc.identifier.issn1468-4527en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/107409-
dc.description.abstractPurpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the ways in which effectiveness of answers in Yahoo! Answers, one of the largest community question answering sites (CQAs), is related to question types and answerer reputation. Effective answers are defined as those that are detailed, readable, superior in quality and contributed promptly. Five question types that were studied include factoid, list, definition, complex interactive and opinion. Answerer reputation refers to the past track record of answerers in the community. Design/methodology/approach – The data set comprises 1,459 answers posted in Yahoo! Answers in response to 464 questions that were distributed across the five question types. The analysis was done using factorial analysis of variance. Findings– The results indicate that factoid, definition and opinion questions are comparable in attracting high quality as well as readable answers. Although reputed answerers generally fared better in offering detailed and high-quality answers, novices were found to submit more readable responses. Moreover, novices were more prompt in answering factoid, list and definition questions. Originality/value – By analysing variations in answer effectiveness with a twin focus on question types and answerer reputation, this study explores a strand of CQA research that has hitherto received limited attention. The findings offer insights to users and designers of CQAs.en
dc.format.extent14 p.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesOnline information reviewen
dc.rights© 2015 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Online Information Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [Article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OIR-10-2014-0232].en
dc.subjectDRNTU::Social sciences::Communication::Audience researchen
dc.subjectDRNTU::Library and information scienceen
dc.titleMeasuring the effectiveness of answers in Yahoo! Answersen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.contributor.schoolWee Kim Wee School of Communication and Informationen
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/OIR-10-2014-0232en
dc.description.versionAccepted versionen
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:WKWSCI Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
EffectivenessOfAnswers.pdf129.34 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 20

14
Updated on Mar 7, 2021

PublonsTM
Citations 20

12
Updated on Mar 4, 2021

Page view(s) 20

458
Updated on Apr 22, 2021

Download(s) 5

442
Updated on Apr 22, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.