Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/137188
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, George T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKennedy, Ben M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLallemant, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Thomas M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAllen, Nicoleen_US
dc.contributor.authorScott, Allanen_US
dc.contributor.authorJenkins, Susanna F.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-05T07:58:28Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-05T07:58:28Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationWilliams, G. T., Kennedy, B. M., Lallemant, D., Wilson, T. M., Allen, N., Scott, A., & Jenkins, S. F. (2019). Tephra cushioning of ballistic impacts : quantifying building vulnerability through pneumatic cannon experiments and multiple fragility curve fitting approaches. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 388, 106711. doi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2019.106711en_US
dc.identifier.issn0377-0273en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/137188-
dc.description.abstractBallistic projectiles are the most frequently lethal volcanic hazard close to the vent. Recent eruptions of Ontake in 2014 and Kusatsu-Shirane in 2018 showed that un-reinforced, timber-framed buildings - those typically considered highly vulnerable to the dangerous penetration of ballistics - provided life-saving shelter from ballistic impact. Modelled kinetic energies of some non-penetrating impacts were an order of magnitude above expected penetration thresholds. It has been hypothesised that a pre-existing layer of tephra on the roofs cushioned impacts. To quantitatively test this, and improve our understanding of how buildings respond to projectile impacts, we used a pneumatic cannon to simulate block impacts to clay tiles and reinforced concrete roof slabs covered with tephra layers 0–20 cm thick. Substantially higher impact energies were resisted when tephra was present with 5 cm of tephra approximately tripling the penetration threshold of both building materials. Fragility curves, which relate ballistic hazard intensity with the probability of building damage, were developed from our experimental data following three curve fitting approaches: generalised link models, cumulative link models and data binning. A key benefit of these approaches is that confidence in these curves can be robustly quantified from the data – the first time that this has been attempted for volcanic fragility curves. This study shows how the extent of building damage can be strongly influenced by the sequence of volcanic hazards and provides an example of proactive risk management through testing of physical mitigation strategies in a laboratory environment.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Volcanology and Geothermal Researchen_US
dc.relation.uri10.21979/N9/8XERMIen_US
dc.rights© 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_US
dc.subjectScience::Geologyen_US
dc.titleTephra cushioning of ballistic impacts : quantifying building vulnerability through pneumatic cannon experiments and multiple fragility curve fitting approachesen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.contributor.schoolAsian School of the Environmenten_US
dc.contributor.researchEarth Observatory of Singaporeen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2019.106711-
dc.description.versionPublished versionen_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85075464648-
dc.identifier.volume388en_US
dc.identifier.spage106711en_US
dc.subject.keywordsVolcanoen_US
dc.subject.keywordsVolcanic Hazardsen_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:ASE Journal Articles

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 20

13
Updated on Jul 13, 2024

Web of ScienceTM
Citations 20

6
Updated on Oct 24, 2023

Page view(s) 50

584
Updated on Jul 16, 2024

Download(s) 50

85
Updated on Jul 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.