Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/140075
Title: | Defining “fake news” : a typology of scholarly definitions | Authors: | Tandoc, Edson Castro, Jr. Lim, Zheng Wei Ling, Richard |
Keywords: | Social sciences::Communication | Issue Date: | 2017 | Source: | Tandoc, E. C., Jr., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “fake news” : a typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137-153. doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143 | Journal: | Digital Journalism | Abstract: | This paper is based on a review of how previous studies have defined and operationalized the term “fake news.” An examination of 34 academic articles that used the term “fake news” between 2003 and 2017 resulted in a typology of types of fake news: news satire, news parody, fabrication, manipulation, advertising, and propaganda. These definitions are based on two dimensions: levels of facticity and deception. Such a typology is offered to clarify what we mean by fake news and to guide future studies. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/140075 | ISSN: | 2167-0811 | DOI: | 10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143 | Rights: | © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. All rights reserved. | Fulltext Permission: | none | Fulltext Availability: | No Fulltext |
Appears in Collections: | WKWSCI Journal Articles |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
1
852
Updated on Jan 21, 2023
Web of ScienceTM
Citations
1
721
Updated on Jan 26, 2023
Page view(s) 1
1,290
Updated on Jan 27, 2023
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.