Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142124
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Yeow, Adrian | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sia, Siew Kien | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Soh, Christina | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chua, Cecil | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-16T04:19:58Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-06-16T04:19:58Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Yeow, A., Sia, S. K., Soh, C., & Chua, C. (2018). Boundary organization practices for collaboration in enterprise integration. Information Systems Research, 29(1), 149-168. doi:10.1287/isre.2017.0743 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1047-7047 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142124 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Multiparty collaboration is particularly challenging in large-scale enterprise integration (EI) implementations as diverse organizational subunits and external consultants need to work together to enact transformational change. We argue from prior research that a boundary organization-a formal organizational space that enables participants with divergent interests to collaborate-provides a relatively durable structure to manage emergent tensions and conflicts among stakeholders in EI projects. To better understand how a boundary organization enables ongoing, dynamic, multiparty collaboration, we introduce the concept of boundary organization practices to describe practices enacted as part of the boundary organization to define the working rules and arrangements for diverse stakeholders to work together.We conducted a longitudinal exploratory case study of a multiyear EI implementation in a large logistics organization. Our analysis of the longitudinal data led us to identify three sets of boundary organization practices (i.e., organizing to negotiate, to contain, and to sustain). These sets of practices emerged to address the divergence that arose in each of the three phases (designing, realizing, and leveraging) of EI implementation. We also find artifacts to be an integral part of the boundary organization practices as they motivated, coordinated, and enabled collaboration among diverse stakeholders. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Information Systems Research | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2018 INFORMS. All rights reserved. | en_US |
dc.subject | Business::Management | en_US |
dc.title | Boundary organization practices for collaboration in enterprise integration | en_US |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.contributor.school | College of Business (Nanyang Business School) | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1287/isre.2017.0743 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85044006190 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 29 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 149 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 168 | en_US |
dc.subject.keywords | Enterprise Integration | en_US |
dc.subject.keywords | Enterprise System | en_US |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
Appears in Collections: | NBS Journal Articles |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
20
10
Updated on Mar 16, 2023
Web of ScienceTM
Citations
20
8
Updated on Mar 18, 2023
Page view(s)
138
Updated on Mar 22, 2023
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.