Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLee, Helenaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPang, Natalieen_US
dc.identifier.citationLee, H., & Pang, N. (2018). Understanding the effects of task and topical knowledge in the evaluation of websites as information patch. Journal of Documentation, 74(1), 162-186. doi:10.1108/JD-04-2017-0050en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the role of task and user’s topic familiarity in the evaluation of information patch (websites). Design/methodology/approach: An experimental study was conducted in a computer laboratory to examine users’ information seeking and foraging behaviour. In total, 160 university students participated in the research. Two types of task instructions, specifically defined and non-specifically defined (general) task types were administered. Mixed methods approach involving both quantitative and qualitative thematic coding were adopted, from the data of the questionnaire surveys and post-experiment interviews. Findings: In the context of task attributes, users who conducted information seeking task with specifically defined instructions, as compared to the non-specifically defined instructions, demonstrated stricter credibility evaluations. Evidence demonstrated the link between topical knowledge and credibility perception. Users with topical knowledge applied critical credibility assessments than users without topical knowledge. Furthermore, the evidential results supported that the level of difficulty and knowledge of the topic or subject matter associated with users’ credibility evaluations. Users who have lesser or no subject knowledge and who experienced difficulty in the information search tended to be less diagnostic in their appraisal of the information patch (website or webpages). Users equipped with topical knowledge and who encountered less difficulty in the search, exhibited higher expectation and evaluative criteria of the information patch. Research limitations/implications: The constraints of time in the lab experiment, carried out in the presence of and under the observation of the researcher, may affect users’ information seeking behaviour. It would be beneficial to consider users’ information search gratifications and motivations in studying information evaluations and foraging patterns. There is scope to investigate users’ proficiency such as expert or novice, and individual learning styles in assessing information credibility. Practical implications: Past studies on information evaluation, specifically credibility is often associated with users’ characteristics, source, or contents. This study sheds light on the context of task type, task difficulty and topical knowledge in affecting users’ information judgement. Originality/value: One of the scarce studies in relating task orientation, task difficulty and topical knowledge to information evaluations.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Documentationen_US
dc.rights© 2018 Emerald Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.subjectSocial sciences::Communicationen_US
dc.titleUnderstanding the effects of task and topical knowledge in the evaluation of websites as information patchen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.contributor.schoolWee Kim Wee School of Communication and Informationen_US
dc.subject.keywordsTask Typeen_US
dc.subject.keywordsInformation Credibilityen_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:WKWSCI Journal Articles

Citations 50

Updated on Jan 27, 2023

Web of ScienceTM
Citations 50

Updated on Jan 23, 2023

Page view(s)

Updated on Feb 2, 2023

Google ScholarTM




Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.