Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Normal faulting and mass movement during ridge subduction inferred from porosity transition and zeolitization in the Costa Rica subduction zone
Authors: Hamahashi, Mari
Screaton, Elizabeth
Tanikawa, Wataru
Hashimoto, Yoshitaka
Martin, Kylara
Saito, Saneatsu
Kimura, Gaku
Keywords: Science::Geology
Issue Date: 2017
Source: Hamahashi, M., Screaton, E., Tanikawa, W., Hashimoto, Y., Martin, K., Saito, S., & Kimura, G. (2017). Normal faulting and mass movement during ridge subduction inferred from porosity transition and zeolitization in the Costa Rica subduction zone. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 18(7), 2601-2616. doi:10.1002/2016gc006577
Journal: Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Abstract: Subduction of the buoyant Cocos Ridge offshore the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica substantially affects the upper plate structure through a variety of processes, including outer forearc uplift, erosion, and focused fluid flow. To investigate the nature of a major seismic reflector (MSR) developed between slope sediments (late Pliocene-late Pleistocene silty clay) and underlying higher velocity upper plate materials (late Pliocene-early Pleistocene clayey siltstone), we infer possible mechanisms of sediment removal by examining the consolidation state, microstructure, and zeolite assemblages of sediments recovered from Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Expedition 344 Site U1380. Formation of Ca-type zeolites, laumontite and heulandite, inferred to form in the presence of Ca-rich fluids, has caused porosity reduction. We adjust measured porosity values for these pore-filling zeolites and evaluated the new porosity profile to estimate how much material was removed at the MSR. Based on the composite porosity-depth curve, we infer the past burial depth of the sediments directly below the MSR. The corrected and uncorrected porosity-depth curves yield values of 800 ± 70 m and 900 ± 70 m, respectively. We argue that deposition and removal of this entire estimated thickness in 0.49 Ma would require unrealistically large sedimentation rates and suggest that normal faulting at the MSR must contribute. The porosity offset could be explained with maximum 250 ± 70 m of normal fault throw, or 350 ± 70 m if the porosity were not corrected. The porosity correction significantly reduces the amount of sediment removal needed for the combination of mass movement and normal faulting that characterize the slope in this margin.
ISSN: 1525-2027
DOI: 10.1002/2016gc006577
Rights: © 2017 American Geophysical Union. All rights reserved. This paper was published in Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems and is made available with permission of American Geophysical Union.
Fulltext Permission: open
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:EOS Journal Articles

Citations 20

Updated on Mar 2, 2021

Citations 20

Updated on Mar 4, 2021

Page view(s)

Updated on Jul 3, 2022


Updated on Jul 3, 2022

Google ScholarTM




Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.