Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Human rights, intervention and East Timor : Asean perspectives and response
Authors: Nathan, Patrick
Keywords: DRNTU::Social sciences::Political science
Issue Date: 2000
Abstract: The humanitarian intervention debate in the UN began in earnest with former Secretary General Boutros-Boutros Ghali's "Agenda for Peace". At the heart of this debate is the intervention vs. sovereignty controversy. Although eight years have passed with much written about the subject, the developing world remains strongly suspicious and opposed to the notion of humanitarian intervention. But human rights abuses must be stopped and the UN is still the best agency to do it. Just last year, the debate on humanitarian intervention was rekindled by incumbent UN Secretary General, Kofi Annan. The "Great United Nations Intervention Debate" split the UN General Assembly into three camps: those dead set against intervention, those agitating for more active intervention and those pressing for clearer rules and fairer use of force. The differences between these three camps mirror the larger intervention vs. sovereignty debate.
Rights: Nanyang Technological University
Fulltext Permission: restricted
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:RSIS Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
  Restricted Access
6.81 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Page view(s) 10

Updated on Jan 27, 2021

Google ScholarTM


Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.