Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||A decade of infant neuroimaging research : what have we learned and where are we going?||Authors:||Azhari, Atiqah
Neoh, Michelle Jin-Yee
Balagtas, Jan Paolo M.
Tan, Hannah Hui Ann
Goh, Pamela Pei Lin
Ang, Anais Xin Hui Anais
Bornstein, Marc H.
|Keywords:||Social sciences::Psychology||Issue Date:||2019||Source:||Azhari, A., Truzzi, A., Neoh, M. J. Y., Balagtas, J. P. M., Tan, H. A. H., Goh, P. L. P., . . . Esposito, G. (2020). A decade of infant neuroimaging research : what have we learned and where are we going? Infant Behavior and Development, 58, 101389-. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2019.101389||Project:||NAP SUG Grant (GE)
|Journal:||Infant Behavior and Development||Abstract:||The past decade has seen the emergence of neuroimaging studies of infant populations. Incorporating imaging has resulted in invaluable insights about neurodevelopment at the start of life. However, little has been enquired of the experimental specifications and study characteristics of typical findings. This review systematically screened empirical studies that used electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG), functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) on infants (max. age of 24 months). From more than 21,000 publications, a total of 710 records were included for analyses. With the exception of EEG studies, infant studies with MEG, fNIRS, and fMRI were most often conducted around birth and at 12 months. The vast majority of infant studies came from North America, with very few studies conducted in Africa, certain parts of South America, and Southeast Asia. Finally, longitudinal neuroimaging studies were inclined to adopt EEG, followed by fMRI, fNIRS, and MEG. These results show that there is compelling need for studies with larger sample sizes, studies investigating a broader range of infant developmental periods, and studies from under- and less-developed regions in the world. Addressing these shortcomings in the future will provide a more representative and accurate understanding of neurodevelopment in infancy.||URI:||https://hdl.handle.net/10356/143371||ISSN:||0163-6383||DOI:||10.1016/j.infbeh.2019.101389||Rights:||© 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. This paper was published in Infant Behavior and Development and is made available with permission of Elsevier Inc.||Fulltext Permission:||embargo_20211231||Fulltext Availability:||With Fulltext|
|Appears in Collections:||SSS Journal Articles|
Files in This Item:
|A decade of infant neuroimaging research.pdf|
|1.31 MB||Adobe PDF||Under embargo until Dec 31, 2021|
Updated on Mar 10, 2021
Updated on Mar 3, 2021
Updated on Apr 17, 2021
Updated on Apr 17, 2021
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.