Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/144958
Title: The specter of failed transition : Tocqueville and the reception of liberalism in reform China
Authors: van Dongen, Els
Keywords: Humanities::History
Issue Date: 2020
Source: van Dongen, E. (2020). The specter of failed transition : Tocqueville and the reception of liberalism in reform China. Tocqueville Review, 41(1), 253-279. doi:10.3138/ttr.41.1.253
Journal: The Tocqueville Review
Abstract: What connects the political thinker and historian Alexis de Tocqueville (1805-1859) to China? Hitherto, scholars have answered this question by looking into references to China in his Democracy in America and The Old Regime and the Revolution or by applying insights from his works to issues of democratization. This article seeks to move beyond these “Tocquevillian perspectives on China” and instead foregrounds “Chinese perspectives on Tocqueville”: How did Chinese thinkers understand Tocqueville in reform China (post-1978)? Building on existing research that has analyzed Tocqueville as a thinker concerned with transition rather than with democratization per se, this article posits that Chinese intellectuals interpreted Tocqueville to warn against the dangers of “failed transition” after the suppression of the Tiananmen demonstrations and the disintegration of the Soviet Union. Swayed by the Tocquevillian paradox of reform, they identified the French and Anglo-American “models” as “cases” from which general lessons could be drawn. The article further posits that the renewed interest in Tocqueville in the 2010s was also marked by the specter of failed transition. Later, readers and officials pinpointed the rise of social inequality as a potentially destabilizing factor. Finally, the article sheds light on these contemporary readings of Tocqueville against the broader background of the history of liberalism in China.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/144958
ISSN: 0730-479X
DOI: 10.3138/ttr.41.1.253
Rights: © University of Toronto Press. All rights reserved. This paper was published in The Tocqueville Review and is made available with permission of University of Toronto Press.
Fulltext Permission: open
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:SoH Journal Articles

Page view(s)

155
Updated on May 20, 2022

Download(s) 50

27
Updated on May 20, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.