Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/145607
Title: Patient-related barriers to timely dialysis access preparation : a qualitative study of the perspectives of patients, family members, and health care providers
Authors: Griva, Konstadina
Seow, Pei Shing
Seow, Terina Ying-Ying
Goh, Zhong Sheng
Choo, Jason Chon Jun
Foo, Marjorie
Newman, Stanton
Keywords: Science::Medicine
Issue Date: 2020
Source: Griva, K., Seow, P. S., Seow, T. Y.-Y., Goh, Z. S., Choo, J. C. J., Foo, M., & Newman, S. Patient-related barriers to timely dialysis access preparation : a qualitative study of the perspectives of patients, family members, and health care providers. Kidney Medicine, 2(1), 29-41. doi:10.1016/j.xkme.2019.10.011
Project: NMRC/HSRG/0058/2016
Journal: Kidney Medicine
Abstract: Rational & Objective: A key aspect of smooth transition to dialysis is the timely creation of a permanent access. Despite early referral to kidney care, initiation onto dialysis is still suboptimal for many patients, which has clinical and cost implications. This study aimed to explore perspectives of various stakeholders on barriers to timely access creation. Study Design: Qualitative study. Setting & Participants: Semi-structured interviews with 96 participants (response rate, 67%), including patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease (n = 30), new hemodialysis patients with (n = 18) and without (n = 20) permanent access (arteriovenous fistula), family members (n = 19), and kidney health care providers (n = 9). Analytical Approach: Thematic analysis. Results: Patients reported differential levels of behavioral activation toward access creation: avoidance/denial, wait and see, or active intention. 6 core themes were identified: (1) lack of symptoms, (2) dialysis fears and practical concerns (exaggerated fear, pain, cost, lifestyle disruptions, work-related concerns, burdening their families), (3) evaluating value against costs/risks of access creation (benefits, threat of operation, viability, prompt for early initiation), (4) preference for alternatives, (5) social influences (hearsay, family involvement, experiences of others), and (6) health care provider interactions (mistrust, interpersonal tension, lack of clarity in information). Themes were common to all groups, whereas nuanced perspectives of family members and health care providers were noted in some subthemes. Limitations: Response bias. Conclusions: Individual, interpersonal, and psychosocial factors compromise dialysis preparation and contribute to suboptimal dialysis initiation. Our findings support the need for interventions to improve patient and family engagement and address emotional concerns and misperceptions about preparing for dialysis.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/145607
ISSN: 2590-0595
DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2019.10.011
Rights: © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the National Kidney Foundation, Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Fulltext Permission: open
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:LKCMedicine Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PIIS2590059519301827.pdf1.01 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 20

14
Updated on Jan 29, 2023

Web of ScienceTM
Citations 20

15
Updated on Jan 29, 2023

Page view(s)

189
Updated on Jan 28, 2023

Download(s) 50

63
Updated on Jan 28, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.