Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Challenges when evaluating cognitive bias modification interventions for substance use disorder||Authors:||Zhang, Melvyn W. B.
Smith, Helen Elizabeth
|Keywords:||Social sciences::Psychology||Issue Date:||2020||Source:||Zhang, M. W. B., & Smith, H. E. (2020). Challenges when evaluating cognitive bias modification interventions for substance use disorder. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 7821-. doi:10.3390/ijerph17217821||Project:||NMRC/Fellowship/0048/2017||Journal:||International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health||Abstract:||In recent years, advances in experimental psychology have led to a better understanding in automatic, unconscious processes, referred to as attentional and approach biases amongst individuals with substance use disorders. Attentional biases refer to the relatively automatic tendencies for attention to be preferentially allocated towards substance-related cues. Whereas, approach bias refers to the relatively automatic behavioral tendencies of individuals to reach out to substance-related cues in their natural environment. While, several reviews confirm the existence of these biases, and the effectiveness of bias modification, the conduct of cognitive bias modification amongst substance-using individuals is not without its challenges. One of these is that cognitive biases, both attentional and approach biases, are not universally present; and several individual differences factors modulate the magnitude of the biases. Another challenge that investigators faced in their conduct of cognitive bias modification relates to the selection of the appropriate task for bias assessment and modification. Other challenges intrinsic to cognitive bias modification intervention relates to that of participant attrition, much like conventional psychotherapies. Negative findings, of the absence of biases at baseline, or the lack of effectiveness of bias modification have been reported in studies of cognitive bias modification. All these challenges could have an impact on bias assessment and modification. In this perspective paper, we will explore the literature surrounding each of these challenges and discuss potential measures that could be undertaken to mitigate these clinical and research challenges.||URI:||https://hdl.handle.net/10356/145666||ISSN:||1661-7827||DOI:||10.3390/ijerph17217821||Rights:||© 2020 The Authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).||Fulltext Permission:||open||Fulltext Availability:||With Fulltext|
|Appears in Collections:||LKCMedicine Journal Articles|
Updated on Nov 25, 2022
Web of ScienceTM
Updated on Nov 27, 2022
Updated on Nov 30, 2022
Updated on Nov 30, 2022
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.