Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/145697
Title: | Effect of PreAnaesThesia Computerized Health (PATCH) assessment on duration of nurse-patient consultation and patient experience : a pilot trial | Authors: | Osman, Tarig Lew, Eileen Lum, Elaine Chew, Jennifer Dabas, Rajive Sng, Ban Leong Car, Josip |
Keywords: | Science::Medicine | Issue Date: | 2020 | Source: | Osman, T., Lew, E., Lum, E., Chew, J., Dabas, R., Sng, B. L., & Car, J. (2020). Effect of PreAnaesThesia Computerized Health (PATCH) assessment on duration of nurse-patient consultation and patient experience : a pilot trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), 4972-. doi:10.3390/ijerph17144972 | Journal: | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health | Abstract: | Preanaesthesia health assessment is gradually transitioning from paper-based, face-to-face assessment to digitized assessment, self-administered by the patient. This transition could potentially optimize the various goals of assessment, notably facilitating the efficient collection of the patient’s health information. We have previously developed and validated a tablet application (PreAnaesThesia Computerized Health assessment application or “PATCH”) for patients to conduct preanaesthesia self-assessment. In a randomized controlled trial, we sought to compare the duration of nurse–patient consultation and patient satisfaction between patients who underwent PATCH self-assessment vs. standard care nurse-led assessment. Fifty-two elective surgical patients were randomized to complete either PATCH assessment or standard care nurse-led assessment at an outpatient preoperative clinic. The duration of nurse–patient consultation was subsequently noted for all patients who also completed a satisfaction survey. The mean (SD) nurse–patient consultation times in the PATCH and standard care groups were comparable, at 11.5 (3.6) min and 12.2 (2.9) min, respectively (p = 0.703). Overall satisfaction scores were also comparable, at 23.9 and 27.0 respectively (p = 0.451) for the PATCH and standard nurse assessment groups. Favorable perceptions of PATCH among users ranged between 41.7% and 79.2%. In conclusion, PATCH self-assessment can feasibly be introduced into current practice with comparable nurse–patient consultation times and patient satisfaction. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/145697 | ISSN: | 1661-7827 | DOI: | 10.3390/ijerph17144972 | Schools: | Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine) | Research Centres: | Centre for Population Health Sciences | Rights: | © 2020 The Authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). | Fulltext Permission: | open | Fulltext Availability: | With Fulltext |
Appears in Collections: | LKCMedicine Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ijerph-17-04972.pdf | 660.87 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
50
6
Updated on May 4, 2025
Web of ScienceTM
Citations
20
5
Updated on Oct 27, 2023
Page view(s) 50
613
Updated on May 6, 2025
Download(s) 50
122
Updated on May 6, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.