Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/145959
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorXiong, Panen_US
dc.contributor.authorLong, Chengen_US
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Huiyuen_US
dc.contributor.authorBattiston, Robertoen_US
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Xueminen_US
dc.contributor.authorShen, Xuhuien_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-18T07:17:33Z-
dc.date.available2021-01-18T07:17:33Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationXiong, P., Long, C., Zhou, H., Battiston, R., Zhang, X., & Shen, X. (2020). Identification of electromagnetic pre-earthquake perturbations from the DEMETER data by machine learning. Remote Sensing, 12(21), 3643-. doi:10.3390/rs12213643en_US
dc.identifier.issn2072-4292en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/145959-
dc.description.abstractThe low-altitude satellite DEMETER recorded many cases of ionospheric perturbations observed on occasion of large seismic events. In this paper, we explore 16 spot-checking classification algorithms, among which, the top classifier with low-frequency power spectra of electric and magnetic fields was used for ionospheric perturbation analysis. This study included the analysis of satellite data spanning over six years, during which about 8760 earthquakes with magnitude greater than or equal to 5.0 occurred in the world. We discover that among these methods, a gradient boosting-based method called LightGBM outperforms others and achieves superior performance in a five-fold cross-validation test on the benchmarking datasets, which shows a strong capability in discriminating electromagnetic pre-earthquake perturbations. The results show that the electromagnetic pre-earthquake data within a circular region with its center at the epicenter and its radius given by the Dobrovolsky’s formula and the time window of about a few hours before shocks are much better at discriminating electromagnetic pre-earthquake perturbations. Moreover, by investigating different earthquake databases, we confirm that some low-frequency electric and magnetic fields’ frequency bands are the dominant features for electromagnetic pre-earthquake perturbations identification. We have also found that the choice of the geographical region used to simulate the training set of non-seismic data influences, to a certain extent, the performance of the LightGBM model, by reducing its capability in discriminating electromagnetic pre-earthquake perturbations.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofRemote Sensingen_US
dc.rights© 2020 The Authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.subjectEngineering::Computer science and engineeringen_US
dc.titleIdentification of electromagnetic pre-earthquake perturbations from the DEMETER data by machine learningen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Computer Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/rs12213643-
dc.description.versionPublished versionen_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85096115813-
dc.identifier.issue21en_US
dc.identifier.volume12en_US
dc.subject.keywordsEarthquakeen_US
dc.subject.keywordsSeismic Precursorsen_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:SCSE Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
remotesensing-12-03643-v2.pdf31.23 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 50

1
Updated on Mar 5, 2021

Page view(s)

131
Updated on Jul 6, 2022

Download(s) 50

27
Updated on Jul 6, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.