Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/146039
Title: Environmental assessment of magnesium oxychloride cement samples : a case study in Europe
Authors: Kastiukas, Gediminas
Ruan, Shaoqin
Unluer, Cise
Liang, Shuang
Zhou, Xiangming
Keywords: Engineering::Environmental engineering
Issue Date: 2019
Source: Kastiukas, G., Ruan, S., Unluer, C., Liang, S., & Zhou, X. (2019). Environmental assessment of magnesium oxychloride cement samples : a case study in Europe. Sustainability, 11(24), 6957-. doi:10.3390/su11246957
Journal: Sustainability
Abstract: This study is the first in the literature to systematically assess the environmental impacts of magnesium oxychloride cement (MOC) samples, which are regarded as a more eco-friendly construction material than Portland cement. The environmental impacts of MOC samples prepared with various molar ratios of MgO/MgCl2∙6H2O and sources of reactive magnesia were obtained via a life cycle assessment (LCA) approach (from cradle to grave), and the obtained outcomes were further compared with the counterparts associated with the preparation of Portland cement (PC) samples. Meanwhile, a sensitivity analysis in terms of shipping reactive magnesia from China to Europe was performed. Results indicated that the preparation of MOC samples with higher molar ratios led to more severe overall environmental impacts and greater CO2 sequestration potentials due to the difference of energies required for the production of MgO and MgCl2∙6H2O as well as their various CO2 binding capacities, whereas in terms of CO2 intensities, the molar ratios in MOC samples should be carefully selected depending on the strength requirements of the applications. Furthermore, various allocation procedures and MgO production processes will greatly influence the final outcomes, and allocation by mass is more recommended. Meanwhile, the environmental impacts associated with the transportation of reactive magnesia from China to Europe can be ignored. Finally, it can be concluded that MOC concrete is no longer a type of ‘low-carbon’ binder in comparison with PC concrete in terms of CO2 emissions, and in view of the single scores and mixing triangles for weighing, MOC concrete can only be identified as a type of more sustainable binder than PC concrete when the main component MgO in MOC samples is obtained through the dry process route rather than the wet process route.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/146039
ISSN: 2071-1050
DOI: 10.3390/su11246957
Rights: © 2019 The Authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Fulltext Permission: open
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:CEE Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
sustainability-11-06957.pdf4.17 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 20

11
Updated on Nov 28, 2022

Web of ScienceTM
Citations 20

8
Updated on Nov 26, 2022

Page view(s)

119
Updated on Dec 1, 2022

Download(s) 50

48
Updated on Dec 1, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.