Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||The homogenization of ethnic differences in Singapore English? A consonantal production study||Authors:||Kalaivanan, Kastoori
Tan, Ying Ying
|Keywords:||Humanities::Linguistics||Issue Date:||2020||Source:||Kalaivanan, K., Sumartono, F., & Tan, Y. Y. (2020). The homogenization of ethnic differences in Singapore English? A consonantal production study. Language and Speech, [Early Access}. doi:10.1177/0023830920925510||Project:||MOE2015-T2-1-120||Journal:||Language and Speech||Abstract:||Past research on Singapore English (SgE) has shown that there are specific segmental and prosodic patterns that are unique to the three major ethnic groups, Chinese, Malay, and Indian in Singapore. These features have been highlighted as the "stereotypical" ethnic markers of SgE speakers, assuming substrate influence from the speakers' "ethnic" languages (Mandarin, Malay, and Tamil). However, recent research suggests that Singaporeans are becoming increasingly English dominant and has challenged the position of the ethnic languages as true "mother tongues" of Singaporeans. Hence, this study seeks to question if such "stereotypical" ethnic features exist, and if so, the extent to which a less dominant ethnic language would affect the phonology of speakers' English. This study looks specifically at the production of consonants /f/, /θ/, /t/, /v/, and /w/ as salient segmental features in SgE. Participants' phonetic behavior of /θ/, which was produced similarly across the three ethnic groups, disputed substrate influence. Tamil speakers were the most disparate, particularly with the /v/-/w/ contrast production. However, these deviations were often sporadic phonetic changes, which scarcely reflect robust speech patterns in the community. As a result, consonantal production in SgE is found to be largely independent of substrate influence and relatively uniform across the three ethnicities. The homogeneity observed in this study sheds light on bilinguals' acquisition of sounds, and it also provides phonological evidence toward the understanding of the evolutionary process of postcolonial Englishes.||URI:||https://hdl.handle.net/10356/146462||ISSN:||0023-8309||DOI:||10.1177/0023830920925510||Rights:||© 2020 The Author(s). All rights reserved.||Fulltext Permission:||none||Fulltext Availability:||No Fulltext|
|Appears in Collections:||SoH Journal Articles|
Updated on May 27, 2022
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.